Top SaaS Companies in Kyoto

List of the largest SaaS companies in Kyoto, Japan (Click to apply)

These are the top SaaS companies in Kyoto, Japan. In todays day and age its possible to launch a company from anywhere. We wanted to show some love for Kyoto by featuring these 5 companies with combined revenues of $6.0M.

Together, Kyoto SaaS companies employ over 80 employees, have raised $0.0 capital, and serve over 100 customers around the world.

$0 - $1M ARR
  1. Ship&co $860.8K
  2. Questetra $491.9K
  3. Soraharu $235.3K
$1M - $5M ARR
  1. HACARUS $3.3M
  2. AdInte $1.1M
$5M - $10M ARR
    $10M+ ARR
      1. 01
        HACARUS

        HACARUS

        Healthcare Software

        Developer of health care technology designed for medical equipment or research and manufacturing or industrial optimization and defect detection. The company's technology offers SaaS and embedded solutions for these areas, small data and cutting-edge techn

        $3M

        $405M

        100

        41

        2014

        Kyoto

      2. 02
        AdInte

        AdInte

        Digital Advertising Platforms

        Developer of a Saas based demand-side platform (DSP) designed to promote smartphone specifications. The company's advertising platform provides users the access to schedule the delivery date and time of the product and takes care of every problem related t

        $1M

        $5M

        13

        2013

        Kyoto

      3. 03
        Ship&co

        Ship&co

        E-Commerce Software

        Developer of a shipping and invoice issuing platform intended to automate the shipping process. The company's platform connects online stores to shipping carriers globally, imports orders from a cloud-based interface and generates shipping documents and au

        $861K

        $1M

        16

        2008

        Kyoto

      4. 04
        Questetra

        Questetra

        Process Automation Software

        Draw your workflow! Run in the Cloud!! Questetra for the world's Business Process Improvement - Enterprise Software company in Kyoto/Japan.

        $492K

        $3M

        6

        2008

        Kyoto

      5. 05
        Soraharu

        Soraharu

        Personal Development Software

        Management of online communities and provision of SaaS applications to reduce the burden and risk of many professionals.

        $235K

        4

        2020

        Kyoto

      1-5 of 5

      What are the fastest growing companies doing?

      83 of the fastest growing companies that also have the most revenue have a clear expansion revenue strategy. On average, sales reps are selling plans where starting contract value is $4,606.

      Those same companies employ 1,678 sales reps that carry a quota. The most common compensation plan used by these companies is a 1:5 ratio of sales rep on target earnings (OTE) to quota. Meaning if a rep can earn $200k in base and commissions, quota target for that year is set at 5x, or $1m in new ARR closed.

      If you’re going to build a high growth SaaS company, you need to figure out how to scale with quota carrying sales reps.

      Which CEO’s are the most efficient capital allocators?

      We can measure this a variety of ways. Which company has the most revenue per employee? What about dollars in revenue compared to dollars raised? What about time, which founder went from $0 to $10m the fastest?

      Looking deeper at dollars in revenue compared to dollars raised, bootstrappers take the cake because they self fund (denominator zero). When we look at companies that have raised at least $1m, Actito is the clear winner generating $21m in revenue, growing 100% yoy, on just 1m raised ($.05 dollars raised for every $1 of revenue).

      Omnisend comes in a close second with $.08 dollars raised for every dollar of revenue. Doing $19m as of December 2020. Proposify gets honorable mention with $0.46 dollars raised (3.25m) for every dollar of revenue ($7m).

      The worst performers here are companies like YayPay with $3.68 dollars raised ($14m) per dollar of revenue ($3.8m). Many of the worst performers just did a round of funding and haven’t had a chance to deploy to drive growth yet. That makes this data less valuable but still illustrative.