Castor Consulting vs Mango Map: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Castor Consulting generates $660K in revenue; Mango Map generates $660K. Castor Consulting and Mango Map are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Castor Consulting and Mango Map on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Castor ConsultingThis company |  Mango Map |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $660K | $660K |
| Team size | 6 | 6 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2012 |
| HQ | Birmingham, United States | Bristol, United Kingdom |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Castor Consulting at a glance
Castor Consulting generates $660K in revenue with 6 employees, headquartered in Birmingham, United States.
- Revenue
- $660K
- Team size
- 6
- Founded
- 2018
Providing automated solutions for manufacturing companies to help improve their operations
Mango Map at a glance
Mango Map generates $660K in revenue with 6 employees, headquartered in Bristol, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $660K
- Team size
- 6
- Founded
- 2012
Create and share interactive web maps that tell the story of your GIS data. Sign up for your free 30-day free trial at www.mangomap.com. Mango makes it easy to put maps and the stories they tell in the hands of those that need them. With…
Other Castor Consulting alternatives
Castor Consulting competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Castor Consulting vs Mango Map: frequently asked questions
Is Castor Consulting or Mango Map bigger?
Castor Consulting is the bigger company by revenue, at $660K against $660K for Mango Map.
How much revenue does Castor Consulting make?
Castor Consulting generates $660K in annual revenue with a team of 6.
How much revenue does Mango Map make?
Mango Map generates $660K in annual revenue with a team of 6.