Integrative Mobile vs Tapp Networks: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Integrative Mobile generates $5M in revenue; Tapp Networks generates $5M. Integrative Mobile and Tapp Networks are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Integrative Mobile and Tapp Networks on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Integrative MobileThis company |  Tapp Networks |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $5M | $5M |
| Team size | 19 | 33 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| HQ | Greenville, United States | Rehoboth Beach, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Integrative Mobile at a glance
Integrative Mobile generates $5M in revenue with 19 employees, headquartered in Greenville, United States.
- Revenue
- $5M
- Team size
- 19
- Founded
- 2013
Strategic marketing firm utilizing modern technologies to meet the ever-changing trends in creative digital marketing and web development
Tapp Networks at a glance
Tapp Networks generates $5M in revenue with 33 employees, headquartered in Rehoboth Beach, United States.
- Revenue
- $5M
- Team size
- 33
- Founded
- 2012
Marketing and technology agency developing digital communication and marketing campaigns for corporations, nonprofits and state agencies
Other Integrative Mobile alternatives
Integrative Mobile competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Integrative Mobile vs Tapp Networks: frequently asked questions
Is Integrative Mobile or Tapp Networks bigger?
Integrative Mobile is the bigger company by revenue, at $5M against $5M for Tapp Networks.
How much revenue does Integrative Mobile make?
Integrative Mobile generates $5M in annual revenue with a team of 19.
How much revenue does Tapp Networks make?
Tapp Networks generates $5M in annual revenue with a team of 33.