Latka logo

Browser Use vs Cimba.AI: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Browser Use generates $1.4M in revenue; Cimba.AI generates $1.5M. Cimba.AI and Browser Use are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Browser Use and Cimba.AI on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Browser Use vs Cimba.AI compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyBrowser Use logoBrowser UseThis companyCimba.AI logoCimba.AI
Revenue$1.4M$1.5M
Team size1310
Founded20252023
HQSan Francisco, United StatesSeattle, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Browser Use logo

Browser Use at a glance

Browser Use generates $1.4M in revenue with 13 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$1.4M
Team size
13
Founded
2025

Leading open-source web agent project with 50k stars in 3 months

Cimba.AI logo

Cimba.AI at a glance

Cimba.AI generates $1.5M in revenue with 10 employees, headquartered in Seattle, United States.

Revenue
$1.5M
Team size
10
Founded
2023

Cimba.AI, the Gen-AI-native platform that gives enterprises the power to create custom adaptive AI agents that can produce deep insights and recommend and trigger business actions based on internal data and knowledge base. The platform…

Other Browser Use alternatives

Browser Use competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Browser Use vs Cimba.AI: frequently asked questions

Is Browser Use or Cimba.AI bigger?

Cimba.AI is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.5M against $1.4M for Browser Use.

How much revenue does Browser Use make?

Browser Use generates $1.4M in annual revenue with a team of 13.

How much revenue does Cimba.AI make?

Cimba.AI generates $1.5M in annual revenue with a team of 10.