Latka logo

Castos vs Mercanis: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Castos generates $3.6M in revenue; Mercanis generates $3.6M. Mercanis and Castos are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Castos and Mercanis on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Castos vs Mercanis compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCastos logoCastosThis companyMercanis logoMercanis
Revenue$3.6M$3.6M
Valuation$21.6MNot disclosed
Customers2KNot disclosed
Team size5333
Cash flow$1Not disclosed
Founded20172020
HQSão Félix da Marinha, PortugalBerlin, Germany

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Castos logo

Castos at a glance

Castos generates $3.6M in revenue with 53 employees, headquartered in São Félix da Marinha, Portugal.

Revenue
$3.6M
Valuation
$21.6M
Customers
2K
Team size
53
Founded
2017

Podcast Hosting and Analytics, Podcast hosting, analytics, and production

Mercanis logo

Mercanis at a glance

Mercanis generates $3.6M in revenue with 33 employees, headquartered in Berlin, Germany.

Revenue
$3.6M
Team size
33
Founded
2020

Mercanis is a holistic procurement suite focusing on S2C (Source-to-Contract), that stands out with fast implementation for customers, an intuitive user experience and innovative features using generative AI. Key modules include: Sourcing…

Other Castos alternatives

Castos competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Castos vs Mercanis: frequently asked questions

Is Castos or Mercanis bigger?

Mercanis is the bigger company by revenue, at $3.6M against $3.6M for Castos.

How much revenue does Castos make?

Castos generates $3.6M in annual revenue with a team of 53.

How much revenue does Mercanis make?

Mercanis generates $3.6M in annual revenue with a team of 33.