eMDs vs Natural Cycles: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
eMDs generates $63.7M in revenue; Natural Cycles generates $63M. eMDs and Natural Cycles are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares eMDs and Natural Cycles on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  eMDsThis company |  Natural Cycles |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $63.7M | $63M |
| Team size | 579 | 163 |
| Founded | 1996 | 2013 |
| HQ | Austin, United States | Stockholm, Sweden |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
eMDs at a glance
eMDs generates $63.7M in revenue with 579 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.
- Revenue
- $63.7M
- Team size
- 579
- Founded
- 1996
Electronic health record and practice management solutions
Natural Cycles at a glance
Natural Cycles generates $63M in revenue with 163 employees, headquartered in Stockholm, Sweden.
- Revenue
- $63M
- Team size
- 163
- Founded
- 2013
Natural Cycles is the company behind the Natural Cycles birth control app, which is the only app to be FDA cleared as birth control. It offers a natural and non-invasive birth control option, utilizing body temperature to determine…
Other eMDs alternatives
eMDs competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
eMDs vs Natural Cycles: frequently asked questions
Is eMDs or Natural Cycles bigger?
eMDs is the bigger company by revenue, at $63.7M against $63M for Natural Cycles.
How much revenue does eMDs make?
eMDs generates $63.7M in annual revenue with a team of 579.
How much revenue does Natural Cycles make?
Natural Cycles generates $63M in annual revenue with a team of 163.