EquipmentShare vs Squeze: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; Squeze has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares EquipmentShare and Squeze on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  EquipmentShareThis company |  Squeze |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 3K | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2014 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Columbia, United States | Detroit, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
EquipmentShare at a glance
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.3B
- Team size
- 3K
- Founded
- 2014
Cloud solutions for the construction industry.
Squeze at a glance
The freelancer's anti-burnout app. Create a holistic schedule that aligns with your preferred pay and work hours. Manage clients, projects, invoices, and time sheets then forecast upcoming pay and receive alerts to upcoming pay gaps.
Other EquipmentShare alternatives
EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
EquipmentShare vs Squeze: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.