Everseat vs Frekil: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Everseat generates $284.2K in revenue; Frekil generates $330K. Frekil is 1.2× bigger than Everseat by revenue. The table below compares Everseat and Frekil on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  EverseatThis company |  Frekil |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $284.2K | $330K |
| Team size | 4 | 3 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2025 |
| HQ | Baltimore, United States | San Francisco, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Everseat at a glance
Everseat generates $284.2K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Baltimore, United States.
- Revenue
- $284.2K
- Team size
- 4
- Founded
- 2013
Developer of a medical enterprise platform designed to provide patient self-scheduling and waitlist management services. The company's platform offers a mobile application that solves the supply and demand of imbalance for appointments…
Frekil at a glance
Frekil generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2025
Scale AI for Medical Scans
Other Everseat alternatives
Everseat competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Everseat vs Frekil: frequently asked questions
Is Everseat or Frekil bigger?
Frekil is the bigger company by revenue, at $330K against $284.2K for Everseat.
How much revenue does Everseat make?
Everseat generates $284.2K in annual revenue with a team of 4.
How much revenue does Frekil make?
Frekil generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.