Latka logo

Filma vs traverse.link: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Filma generates $15.2K in revenue; traverse.link generates $108.9K. traverse.link is 7.2× bigger than Filma by revenue. The table below compares Filma and traverse.link on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Filma vs traverse.link compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyFilma logoFilmaThis companytraverse.link logotraverse.link
Revenue$15.2K$108.9K
Valuation$91.1K$653.4K
Team size13
Founded20192023
HQSydney, AustraliaLondon, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Filma logo

Filma at a glance

Filma generates $15.2K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Sydney, Australia.

Revenue
$15.2K
Valuation
$91.1K
Team size
1
Founded
2019

True video editor for everyone, anywhere. Available on iPhone, iPad and Mac

traverse.link logo

traverse.link at a glance

traverse.link generates $108.9K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$108.9K
Valuation
$653.4K
Team size
3
Founded
2023

Traverse is the only app with mind mapping, note-taking and spaced repetition flashcards in one place.

Other Filma alternatives

Filma competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Filma vs traverse.link: frequently asked questions

Is Filma or traverse.link bigger?

traverse.link is the bigger company by revenue, at $108.9K against $15.2K for Filma.

How much revenue does Filma make?

Filma generates $15.2K in annual revenue with a team of 1.

How much revenue does traverse.link make?

traverse.link generates $108.9K in annual revenue with a team of 3.