Latka logo

Engage2Serve vs Goodtalent: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Engage2Serve generates $5.2M in revenue; Goodtalent generates $5.3M. Goodtalent and Engage2Serve are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Engage2Serve and Goodtalent on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Engage2Serve vs Goodtalent compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyEngage2Serve logoEngage2ServeThis companyGoodtalent logoGoodtalent
Revenue$5.2M$5.3M
ValuationNot disclosed$37M
Team size4715
Founded20142019
HQAustin, United StatesSwindon, Nigeria

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Engage2Serve logo

Engage2Serve at a glance

Engage2Serve generates $5.2M in revenue with 47 employees, headquartered in Austin, United States.

Revenue
$5.2M
Team size
47
Founded
2014

Student lifecycle management for higher education.

Goodtalent logo

Goodtalent at a glance

Goodtalent generates $5.3M in revenue with 15 employees, headquartered in Swindon, Nigeria.

Revenue
$5.3M
Valuation
$37M
Team size
15
Founded
2019

HR Software

Other Engage2Serve alternatives

Engage2Serve competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Engage2Serve vs Goodtalent: frequently asked questions

Is Engage2Serve or Goodtalent bigger?

Goodtalent is the bigger company by revenue, at $5.3M against $5.2M for Engage2Serve.

How much revenue does Engage2Serve make?

Engage2Serve generates $5.2M in annual revenue with a team of 47.

How much revenue does Goodtalent make?

Goodtalent generates $5.3M in annual revenue with a team of 15.