Latka logo

GroupThinq vs Mobile Talent: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

GroupThinq generates $329.4K in revenue; Mobile Talent generates $330K. Mobile Talent and GroupThinq are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares GroupThinq and Mobile Talent on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

GroupThinq vs Mobile Talent compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyGroupThinq logoGroupThinqThis companyMobile Talent logoMobile Talent
Revenue$329.4K$330K
Team size53
Founded20152016
HQDartmouth, CanadaPleasanton, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

GroupThinq logo

GroupThinq at a glance

GroupThinq generates $329.4K in revenue with 5 employees, headquartered in Dartmouth, Canada.

Revenue
$329.4K
Team size
5
Founded
2015

Saas, B2B, Project Management Software

Mobile Talent logo

Mobile Talent at a glance

Mobile Talent generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Pleasanton, United States.

Revenue
$330K
Team size
3
Founded
2016

Mobile Talent, Inc. provides mobile candidate engagement solutions that give recruiters a powerful competitive advantage. Our mobile recruiting SaaS platform helps recruiters worldwide, source, qualify and engage talent pools faster and…

Other GroupThinq alternatives

GroupThinq competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

GroupThinq vs Mobile Talent: frequently asked questions

Is GroupThinq or Mobile Talent bigger?

Mobile Talent is the bigger company by revenue, at $330K against $329.4K for GroupThinq.

How much revenue does GroupThinq make?

GroupThinq generates $329.4K in annual revenue with a team of 5.

How much revenue does Mobile Talent make?

Mobile Talent generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.