Loop Email vs Ongagement: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Loop Email generates $324.9K in revenue; Ongagement generates $330K. Ongagement and Loop Email are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Loop Email and Ongagement on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Loop EmailThis company |  Ongagement |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $324.9K | $330K |
| Team size | 11 | 3 |
| Founded | 2005 | 2011 |
| HQ | Bristol, United Kingdom | Lisboa, Portugal |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Loop Email at a glance
Loop Email generates $324.9K in revenue with 11 employees, headquartered in Bristol, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $324.9K
- Team size
- 11
- Founded
- 2005
Developer of a cloud-based business email management platform designed to allow teams to share ideas, tasks and updates. The company's business email management platform offers collaboration tools such as email organization, business…
Ongagement at a glance
Ongagement generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Lisboa, Portugal.
- Revenue
- $330K
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2011
ONGAGEMENT provides end-to-end engagement technology with a powerful gamification engine that enables fast implementation and easy management. Gamified Engagement Programs made easy!
Other Loop Email alternatives
Loop Email competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Loop Email vs Ongagement: frequently asked questions
Is Loop Email or Ongagement bigger?
Ongagement is the bigger company by revenue, at $330K against $324.9K for Loop Email.
How much revenue does Loop Email make?
Loop Email generates $324.9K in annual revenue with a team of 11.
How much revenue does Ongagement make?
Ongagement generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.