EquipmentShare vs NEO Practice Management: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; NEO Practice Management has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares EquipmentShare and NEO Practice Management on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  EquipmentShareThis company |  NEO Practice Management |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 3K | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2014 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Columbia, United States | Sydney, Australia |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
EquipmentShare at a glance
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.3B
- Team size
- 3K
- Founded
- 2014
Cloud solutions for the construction industry.
NEO Practice Management at a glance
NEO Practice Management is a practice management software integrated with Medicare Online Claiming designed to empower Allied Healthcare Professionals so that they can focus on providing healthcare to their patients. The seamless…
Other EquipmentShare alternatives
EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
EquipmentShare vs NEO Practice Management: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.