Berry AI vs Quick Service Software: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Berry AI generates $3.9M in revenue; Quick Service Software generates $3.9M. Quick Service Software and Berry AI are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Berry AI and Quick Service Software on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.9M | $3.9M |
| Funding raised | $1.7M | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 35 | 60 |
| Founded | Not disclosed | 1999 |
| HQ | Taipei, Taiwan | Canada |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Berry AI at a glance
Berry AI generates $3.9M in revenue with 35 employees, headquartered in Taipei, Taiwan.
- Revenue
- $3.9M
- Funding
- $1.7M
- Team size
- 35
Berry AI uses AI cameras to help fast food chains measure and improve store performance
Quick Service Software at a glance
Quick Service Software generates $3.9M in revenue with 60 employees, headquartered in Canada.
- Revenue
- $3.9M
- Team size
- 60
- Founded
- 1999
Developer of software-as-a-service. The company develops and sells back office software and point of sale terminals for financial management, food cost management, and labour management.
Other Berry AI alternatives
Berry AI competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Berry AI vs Quick Service Software: frequently asked questions
Is Berry AI or Quick Service Software bigger?
Quick Service Software is the bigger company by revenue, at $3.9M against $3.9M for Berry AI.
How much revenue does Berry AI make?
Berry AI generates $3.9M in annual revenue with a team of 35.
How much revenue does Quick Service Software make?
Quick Service Software generates $3.9M in annual revenue with a team of 60.
How much funding has Berry AI raised?
Berry AI has raised $1.7M in total funding.