EquipmentShare vs Site Command: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue; Site Command has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares EquipmentShare and Site Command on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  EquipmentShareThis company |  Site Command |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.3B | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 3K | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2014 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Columbia, United States | Guelph, Canada |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
EquipmentShare at a glance
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in revenue with 3K employees, headquartered in Columbia, United States.
- Revenue
- $2.3B
- Team size
- 3K
- Founded
- 2014
Cloud solutions for the construction industry.
Site Command at a glance
Site Command is the easiest-to-use construction management platform out there. Shave days or even weeks off your projects by managing material selections, change orders and more, all online with realtime notifications.
Other EquipmentShare alternatives
EquipmentShare competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
EquipmentShare vs Site Command: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does EquipmentShare make?
EquipmentShare generates $2.3B in annual revenue with a team of 3K.