Ballpark vs Transcript.im: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Ballpark generates $2M in revenue; Transcript.im generates $40. Ballpark is 49500× bigger than Transcript.im by revenue. The table below compares Ballpark and Transcript.im on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2M | $40 |
| Customers | Not disclosed | 482 |
| Team size | 18 | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2022 | 2026 |
| HQ | London, United Kingdom | United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Ballpark at a glance
Ballpark generates $2M in revenue with 18 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $2M
- Team size
- 18
- Founded
- 2022
Ballpark is a brand new product where you can capture audio, video and written feedback on your prototypes, designs, marketing copy and much more
Transcript.im at a glance
Transcript.im generates $40 in revenue, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $40
- Customers
- 482
- Founded
- 2026
transcript.im is a transcription workspace for public video links and uploaded audio or video. Paste a YouTube, TikTok, or Instagram link, or upload a media file, and the product creates a timestamped transcript that stays connected to the…
Other Ballpark alternatives
Ballpark competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Ballpark vs Transcript.im: frequently asked questions
Is Ballpark or Transcript.im bigger?
Ballpark is the bigger company by revenue, at $2M against $40 for Transcript.im.
How much revenue does Ballpark make?
Ballpark generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 18.
How much revenue does Transcript.im make?
Transcript.im generates $40 in annual revenue.