Bending Spoons vs TextJam: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Bending Spoons generates $1.3B in revenue; TextJam has not disclosed its revenue. The table below compares Bending Spoons and TextJam on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Bending SpoonsThis company |  TextJam |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $1.3B | Not disclosed |
| Valuation | $25.7B | Not disclosed |
| Funding raised | $1.2B | Not disclosed |
| Customers | 12.7M | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 1.7K | Not disclosed |
| Growth | 785.1% | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2013 | Not disclosed |
| HQ | Milan, Italy | United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Bending Spoons at a glance
Bending Spoons generates $1.3B in revenue with 1.7K employees, headquartered in Milan, Italy.
- Revenue
- $1.3B
- Valuation
- $25.7B
- Funding
- $1.2B
- Customers
- 12.7M
- Team size
- 1.7K
- Founded
- 2013
Bending Spoons is a mobile app development company that was founded in Milan, Italy in 2013. The company is focused on creating high-quality mobile apps for both iOS and Android platforms, with a particular emphasis on design and user…
TextJam at a glance
TextJam is an AI editor with novel twists on how humans co-write with AI (and each other). From typing in pen and pencil, to inline prompting, to gestures that resize text, TextJam is a bold new take on what a word processor can be.
Other Bending Spoons alternatives
Bending Spoons competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Bending Spoons vs TextJam: frequently asked questions
How much revenue does Bending Spoons make?
Bending Spoons generates $1.3B in annual revenue with a team of 1.7K.
How much funding has Bending Spoons raised?
Bending Spoons has raised $1.2B in total funding since it was founded in 2013.