Latka logo

Top 9 Risk-Based Authentication Software SaaS Companies in May 2026

As of May 2026, there are 9 SaaS companies in Risk-Based Authentication Software. They have combined revenues of $63.9M and employ 642 people. They have raised $2.3M and serve 290K customers combined.

Risk-Based Authentication Software is a security approach designed to evaluate the risk associated with user login attempts or transactions in real-time. By analyzing various factors such as the user's location, the device being used, and historical behavior, the software dynamically adjusts the authentication requirements. This adaptive mechanism helps organizations enhance security while minimizing friction for legitimate users. Primary use cases for Risk-Based Authentication include protecting sensitive data in financial services, securing remote workforce access, and controlling entry into SaaS applications. The software typically features real-time risk assessment algorithms, multi-factor authentication options, and detailed analytics dashboards. Typical buyers include IT security professionals, compliance officers, and risk management teams seeking to bolster their identity and access management strategies.

Companies
9
Revenue
$63.9M
Funding
$2.3M
Employees
642

Filters

Sorting: Highest -> Lowest

Filters

Top Risk-Based Authentication Software Companies

Showing 10 of 6 companies ranked by annual revenue.

1
GeeTest

China

Provider of an authentication technology designed to help in building an elegant authentication security system. The company's authentication technology allows to identify the difficulties, poor mobility and other security issues, enabling companies to ensure the authentication and security of their portals.

Revenue
$5M
Customers
290K
Year founded
2012
Funding
-
Team size
51
Growth
-
2
ValidSoft

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Provider of security software services. The company provides telecommunications-based, multi-factor mutual authentication, identity and transaction verification services for electronic transaction channels.

Revenue
$2.1M
Customers
-
Year founded
2000
Funding
-
Team size
47
Growth
75.18%
3
The ID Co.

Edinburgh, England, United Kingdom

Developer of an online verification platform designed to verify customer identity for businesses. The company's online verification platform combines bank verified identities and live financial transaction history with bureau and other data sources to help businesses increase conversions, reduce fraud and make more accurate decisions, enabling businesses to get verification identity of customers.

Revenue
$1.8M
Customers
-
Year founded
2011
Funding
-
Team size
48
Growth
58.94%
4
Paygilant

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Developer of a fraud detection application designed to provide fraud prevention services during mobile payments. The company's application uses a technology to protect mobile wallet financial transactions, either executed by NFC, QR Code or online, against fraudulent attacks, enabling customers to get a complete protection against mobile payments, mobile wallets and money transfer fraud, in-store (NFC, QR code, Bluetooth), P2P, in-app and m-commerce transactions.

Revenue
$1.4M
Customers
-
Year founded
2014
Funding
$2.3M
Team size
14
Growth
42.75%
5
Autohost

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Autohost specializes in identity verification and fraud prevention solutions for the sharing economy. We protect against chargebacks and fraud by using machine learning and behavioral checks to evaluate the risk level of transactions and reservations for hotels, Airbnbs, marketplaces, rental companies, and other online businesses.

Revenue
$1.4M
Customers
-
Year founded
2019
Funding
-
Team size
13
Growth
-
6
Keyri

San Francisco, California, United States

Secure fraud prevention and authentication platform for developers

Revenue
$1M
Customers
-
Year founded
2021
Funding
-
Team size
4
Growth
-

Inclusion Criteria

- The software must analyze multiple contextual signals to assess login risk levels. - It should adapt authentication requirements based on the assessed risk. - Must support integration with various identity management systems. - It should offer reporting and analytics features for monitoring login attempts. - Not just a static authentication tool; must provide real-time assessments and adjustments.