Latka logo

Valuation · 2021

$40M

2025 Revenue

$1.5M(Est.)

Funding

$6M

Team · 2024

14

Founded

2021

Permit.io Revenue, Valuation & Funding (2025)

Permit.io is a developer-focused authorization and permissions infrastructure company founded in 2020 by Or Weis. The company allows software teams to embed access control, role management, audit logs, and related permissions capabilities into their products without building those systems from scratch, positioning itself alongside authentication and billing as foundational infrastructure a developer should never have to write themselves.

Permit.io emerged from stealth approximately one month before the March 2022 interview, having spent roughly a year in bootstrapped design-partner mode before launching its self-serve SaaS offering. The product is built on top of OPAL, an open-source authorization layer co-authored by Weis, which had already attracted production deployments at companies including Tesla, Zapier, and Accenture within its first year of existence.

The company closed a $6 million seed round in July 2021 on a capped SAFE, selling less than 15 percent of the business and purchasing roughly two years of runway. At the time of the interview the team stood at 13 people, with Weis targeting 16 as a near-term cruising altitude while pursuing a product-led growth strategy anchored in the open-source community.

Last updated

Permit.io Revenue

Permit.io was effectively pre-SaaS revenue at the time of the March 2022 interview, having launched its self-serve offering approximately one month earlier. Weis acknowledged very early revenue from design partners but characterized the company as pre-SaaS revenue in practical terms. No annual recurring revenue figure was stated.

Permit.io Revenue GrowthReported revenue / ARR over time · latest figure estimated$0$400K$800K$1.2M$1.6M$2M20212022202320242025$0$1.5MSource: GetLatka.com interview on Mar 29, 2022 with Or Weis
YearMilestoneSource
2025Permit.io Hit $1.5m revenue in September 2025Estimated
2021Launched with $0 revenue

The company's near-term revenue pipeline consisted of close to a dozen customers heading to production, some of which had already entered procurement processes. A forward revenue projection cannot be responsibly constructed from the available data: no ARR baseline, growth rate, or revenue trajectory was confirmed by Weis. GetLatka does not produce a forward estimate here because no trailing revenue figure exists on which to apply a growth rate.

Permit.io Valuation, Funding Rounds

Permit.io reached a $40M valuation in 2021, set during its Seed round.

Permit.io has raised $6M in total funding across 1 round, most recently a $6M Seed round in 2021.

Permit.io Capital Raised & ValuationCumulative capital raised and post-money valuation by roundCapital raised (cum.)Valuation$0$0$10M$1.5M$20M$3M$30M$4.5M$40M$6M$50M$7.5M2021$40MSource: GetLatka.com interview on Mar 29, 2022 with Or Weis
YearRoundAmountValuation% SoldSource
2021Seed$6M$40M15%Watch[1]

Founder / CEO

Or Weis

CEO

Or Weis is the CEO and founder of Permit.io. He began working with software at age five and served in the Israel Defense Forces intelligence unit 8200, the military equivalent of the NSA, from age 18 to 24, a tenure he described as slightly longer than most. At the time of the March 2022 interview he was 35 years old, with more than seven years having passed since his IDF service.

Before Permit.io, Weis founded Rookout, a production debugging company, where he rebuilt access control for the product five times over three years, an experience he cited as the direct motivation for Permit.io. He also described prior roles as a lead engineer at cybersecurity and big data companies, as a consultant to Israel's Ministry of Defense, and as VP of R&D at Netline CT Cyber Division. He additionally serves as an ambassador for Snyk and manages what he described as Israel's largest founder product-led growth community.

Weis co-founded Permit.io with at least one co-founder, whom he referenced but did not name in the interview. Net worth was not discussed; no estimate can be derived with sufficient precision given that the SAFE cap was not confirmed on the record.

Q&A

QuestionAnswer
What's your age?38

Customers

As of approximately one month after coming out of stealth in early 2022, Permit.io had close to a dozen customers heading to production, a stage Weis described as one step before paying, with some large corporations already having sent the company through procurement and compliance questionnaires.

The OPAL open-source project, on which Permit.io is built, had at least five large enterprise production installs known to Weis at the time of the interview, including Tesla, Zapier, and Accenture, with the caveat that because the code is public, actual install numbers could be higher. The Slack community for OPAL had grown to close to 300 members, with several actively asking questions each day.

Permit.io uses usage-based pricing tied to monthly active end users rather than developer seats. A free quota covers up to roughly 1,000 monthly active users. Based on the public pricing page slider that Latka referenced during the interview, 5,000 monthly active users would cost approximately $1,000 per month. Weis confirmed that figure directionally, noting customers in the current pipeline range from several hundred to tens of thousands of end users.

We do not have customer count information for Permit.io yet.

Permit.io Business Model

Permit.io monetizes through a usage-based pricing model in which customers pay according to the number of end users they authorize through the platform. Weis described the model as designed to align with the customer's own top-line growth: as a customer's business scales and serves more end users, their Permit.io bill rises proportionally.

The company pursued a design-partner phase before its SaaS launch, working closely with early customers to reach product-market fit without charging for professional services. Early revenue from those design partners existed at the time of the interview but was characterized by Weis as very early. The SaaS offering became broadly available approximately one month before the interview. Profitability was not discussed. Gross margin, churn, LTV, CAC, and burn rate were not discussed in the interview.

Weis cited Snyk as a benchmark, noting that Snyk took almost a bit over two years to reach $1 million in ARR before becoming a multibillion-dollar company, framing that trajectory as the model Permit.io is deliberately building toward with its two-plus years of runway.

Permit.io Employees & Team Size

Permit.io had 13 full-time employees at the time of the March 2022 interview, with Weis noting the number was actually closer to 14 at that moment. He described 16 as the near-term cruising altitude, a headcount he expected to reach quickly. The company was founded in 2020 and operated in bootstrapped mode for approximately one year before raising its seed round.

Permit.io employs approximately 14 people as of 2026.

Permit.io Team GrowthReported headcount over time0369121520212022202320240014141414Source: GetLatka.com interview on Mar 29, 2022 with Or Weis
YearMilestoneSource
2024Reached 14 employees (October 2024)
2022Reached 14 employees (March 2022)

Frequently Asked Questions about Permit.io

What is Permit.io's revenue?

Permit.io generates an estimated $1.5M in annual revenue.

Who founded Permit.io?

Permit.io was founded by Or Weis.

Who is the CEO of Permit.io?

The CEO of Permit.io is Or Weis.

How much funding does Permit.io have?

Permit.io raised $6M across 1 round.

How many employees does Permit.io have?

Permit.io has 14 employees.

Where is Permit.io headquarters?

Permit.io is headquartered in Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Compare Permit.io to the industry

Permit.io operates across multiple industries. Browse revenue, funding, and growth data for Permit.io in each sector below.

Full Interview Transcripts

Full Stack Permissions as a Service Launches, $6m in Fresh Capital to Buy TimeMar 29, 2022

[00:00] Hey, folks. My guest today is Or Weis. He's the CEO and founder of permit.io and co maintainer and author of open source opal.ac. He's a serial entrepreneur who's passionate about developer tools, previously founding rookout.com, a leading production debugging solution and managing upwards Israel's largest founder's PLG community. Before becoming a founder, he worked as a lead engineer in multiple cybersecurity and big data companies, intelligence corporations, and as a consultant for the Ministry of Defense as a VP [00:25] of r and d at Netline CT Cyber Division. Or, you ready to take us to the top? [00:30] >> Yeah. I'm excited to be here. It's gonna be fun. [00:33] You're one of these, like, super smart ex Israeli defense guys, Well, [00:40] >> I try my best. I did get an early start. So I started working with software at the age of five, thanks to my bigger sister. And yeah, and I got to serve in the intelligence score in the IDF in 8200. And that's really kind of really a runway for acceleration that basically changed my life and is awesome. [01:04] So what years, how old are you when you were in the IDF? [01:08] >> So I was between 18 and two up to 24. So I served for slightly longer than than most. [01:19] >> And I obviously, I started off just as a as a grunt and I moved my way up to be an officer and a team lead. But throughout most of my role, I was very hands on as kind of a software engineer, reverse engineer, etcetera, etcetera. [01:33] So what were you doing? I mean, am I allowed to ask questions about what you did at 8,200? [01:38] >> Yeah. You can ask about everything, but I'll have to kill you. [01:40] So Well, I don't wanna die. So is there anything you can share with me that wouldn't get me killed? Just to give us a sense of what you are working on. [01:48] >> So actually, it's it's been more than seven years since my service, so I can be slightly more open about it, but I I obviously can't go into much detail. But I can tell you that I worked a lot in software engineering and cybersecurity. And I can tell you that I had the good fortune of working on projects that were critical for the security of both the state in Israel and other allied nations. I worked on a [02:16] >> lot of cases that I described in other talks as working on high stacks and high stakes. For example, I had a situation where I was required to deploy software to production, but people told me you only have four attempts to get this right and if you fail, people would die. So not exactly CICD [02:39] >> and obviously a lot of stakes. I also in that specific incident, I ended up running into a bug that kind of worked at our endeavors initially. And we really tore our minds to find where it is and it ended up being a vulnerability in Windows itself, in the operating system. And I think seven years later or so it was announced as a CVE, but before that it was unknown. So we both had to dive deep into [03:13] >> the stack and also handle those high stakes. Those kinds of situations I think really taught me a lot about taking software to the edge, into the extreme cases and making the best out of it. [03:26] Mhmm. I mean, just to be clear, I believe the 8,200 unit, you guys are that's a part of the the Israeli Intelligence Corp. It's also the largest and best known. And really, I mean, this would be the unit that if I'm making this up, okay, but this would be the unit if if another country was was trying to launch a cyber attack on Israel. You're this would be the group that's trying to prevent that cyber attack. [03:47] >> Not just cyber attack. So eighty two hundred is essentially the equivalent of the NSA. It's just not a civilian body. It's a military entity, but otherwise, it's exactly the same. I even got to work a bit with the NSA as part of my service, which is cool. It's very interesting to see the differences between between the two. And what's unique about 8,200 is it it gets its first pick out of the draftees into the IDF, and [04:14] >> it's fully independent. It's structured in a way, so if the entire IDF, if the entire state of Israel crumbles to dust, it should still be able to function on its own, and that also creates a lot of interesting mechanics within the organization. [04:29] Oh, what's going on there, YouTube? Good to see you guys. Now imagine this. You love watching these interviews with SaaS founders. But imagine if we took all of the valuation data out from over 2,807 interviews I've done manually. Saves you a lot of time. Well, we've done this, we've built it into the beautiful interface inside of Founderpath. Check this out. I'll show you how you can access this in a second. But you log in, you connect [04:53] your Stripe account, you see your valuation real time, you can see what it changed over the past eighty eight days and even set goals for valuation this year. Now the secret evaluation is there's many different ways to value a SaaS business. So the reason you're gonna see three or four different valuations inside of your Founderpath dashboard, this is all free by the way, is because depending on who's doing the buying of your SaaS company, you're gonna [05:17] get a different valuation. A VC is gonna pay a different valuation, Private equity firm is different. If you're gonna do a minority sale, that's different. And if you sell the whole business, that's a different valuation. You can see all those when I hover over here. Right? So the teal is what a VC would pay. Yellow is what private equity and red is if you sold the whole thing outright. Now what's cool about this is this is [05:39] not built off random data. Again, you guys hear these interviews on YouTube. All these datas are built from real time valuation data points founder share with us on the show. So traction 1,200,000 seed round 3.7 raise. They sold 22% of their business. Go in here and filter by the event. Maybe you only wanna see companies that have sold the whole business. Well, here are a bunch that have been acquired the valuation and the multiple. Maybe you're [06:05] going out right now and you're raising your seed round. We'll go in here and look at all this recent seed deals that went down, what they raised, what valuation they raised at and what percent that they sold. There's never been a larger dataset of SaaS valuations than what you can get now inside of Founderpath. And we're thrilled to bring it to you. All right. We're gonna go back to the YouTube video here in a second. But [06:26] if you wanna check this tool out, if you wanna jump in and sign up, you can check it out for free to get your valuation at this link, this link, founderpath.com/products/valuations. Or if you go to founderpath.com and hover over products, click on get your valuation here, and go ahead and sign up to give it a whirl. Again, all that valuation data live right inside the platform. I hope to see you there. All right. Let's jump back [06:52] into the interview. Yeah. Certainly deterrence. That would be that would even if you take us out, we still exist. I guess, last question. If if the prime minister of Israel is trying to send private communications to another country, you guys would also handle things like encryption of those messages and things of that nature. Right? [07:08] >> That's a separate body. So, there's a so that's actually a difference from the NSA. The NSA is responsible both for securing the infrastructures and intelligence monitoring. [07:22] >> The ISNU or eighty two hundred is only responsible for intelligence. [07:27] I see. And and can in collecting intelligence? [07:30] >> Yeah. Just basically, collecting intelligence in a lot of different ways, a lot of different spectrums, a lot of different texts, but just collecting intelligence, which is a lot of work by itself. [07:40] I'm getting a sense I can't ask for you to give me an example of some intelligence you've collected and how you did it. [07:47] >> Let's see. Maybe I can so there's also things that are kind of open that are as part of the unit. So part of it is something called OSINT, open source intelligence. So just having someone to comb the web, searching through articles, searching for information there, That's also part of the intelligence work done in that unit. But that's, I'd say, the least of it. A lot of things on the other spectrum, even if I told you, you'd [08:17] >> probably think that I'm kind of reading from a science fiction story. [08:22] >> And, yeah, I probably shouldn't go into those, but [08:24] Alright. Let's go into permit. [08:26] >> Think is it's probably that. [08:28] Alright. Fair enough. And probably worse than anything I can think because that's what's required in today's world. But permit.io. So what are people paying you for? What's the company do? [08:36] >> So it's very straightforward. We allow developers to bake permissions into their products in an easy fashion in a way in a way that it's future proof. So they only have to build it once. They don't have to constantly rebuild it. I got to that as in my previous company, Rookout, I ended up rebuilding access control for our product five times in a three year old company. [08:59] Oh, jeez. [08:59] >> And I [08:59] >> was like, that's annoying. That's probably four times, if not five times too many. And, and we quickly realized that this is common for basically every product. You've seen these interfaces, these capabilities across the space a billion times. Things like user management with the ability to assign roles, API key management, approval flows, the ability to ask permissions from another user, audit logs, the ability to see who did what within the system, the ability for each of the [09:29] >> tenants within the system to see that on their own, and invites and impersonation and emergency access. And you've seen all of these things a billion times and every time you saw them, some poor schlep of a developer had to build them from scratch. And what we're saying is very straightforward. Just like you don't want to build your authentication, just like you don't want to build billing, just like you don't want to build a database, there's no [09:52] >> reason that you'll have to build authorization or permissions. So we provide them ready out of the box. You just plug them into your software as an SDK and microservice and you get interfaces on top both for yourself as a manager and developer and both for your customers that wanna work with your product. And unless you wanna sell something, you don't have to. [10:12] This use case makes obviously tons of sense. Give me a sense of what you're targeting SMB mid market enterprise. What's the average customer paying per month right now to use the technology? [10:20] >> So we're first of all, we're doing product led growth and bottom up. So everything is organic as people approach us. So we started with open source and a lot of companies find us through that. And we target the developers themselves. So it doesn't really matter if you're a developer in a tiny startup or if you're working as part of a team in a larger organization. You're facing really the same pain points and you need to adopt [10:46] >> the technology in a very similar fashion. [10:47] But what are they paying? We I get I totally understand the use case here, but I'm curious how you monetize. [10:52] >> So we monetize through a usage based pricing model. So you pay as you go according to the amount of users that you authorize. So the more users you have, the more you pay. And through that, we really try to align with the top line of both sides. So when your business grows and caters to more customers, you're probably making more money and so we can share in that win win kind of situation. [11:14] So what's the typical number of seats like a new customer might, like, start on day one with with permit? We're talking like five seats or like 5,000 seats? [11:22] >> So it it really depends for so first of all, it's really important to indicate that these are not seats. So it's not the licenses for your developers. It's for your end users. It depends on how many end users you have as a as a company delivering a product. And we we see everything between several hundreds to tens of thousands at the moment. [11:42] Okay. So several 100. I'm just playing with the slider on your pricing page. Several 100. So 5,000 monthly active users would be about a grand per month. [11:50] >> Yeah. And, first of all, what we do have for, like, a thousand users, some thousand monthly active users that's still within our free quota, which is important to indicate. And, yeah. But, as you grow or as you move to other, other tiers because you need more features, yeah, you pay according to that pricing tier and slider. [12:11] Okay. Fair enough. Give me more of the backstory here. What year did you launch the company in? [12:16] >> So we got started basically a year and a half ago. We bootstrapped for a year. So my co founder and I worked in garage mode, but not in a garage because I don't have a garage. And we initially started by working with design partners and just delivering the SaaS offering to them, kind of more a bit more handholding. Then as part of the service we built, we had a a [12:43] >> microservice, a component that sync the application with the, the sorry, the authorization layer with the application itself. We decided to export that as an open source project. And that's what's called OPAL today, which you mentioned kind of in the opening brief. And while OPAL is very, very young project, it's not even a year old. It's already being used in production in amazing companies like Tesla, Zapier, Accenture, and others. And we have a very large community of [13:13] >> developers in Slack [13:14] on large? How many? [13:17] >> We're getting close to 300 people on Slack. [13:20] Okay. And and why is that? Like, I mean, I have a Slack group with 1,800 people in it, but 99% of them never say anything. So why do you use the number in Slack as a as the success metric? [13:30] >> So it's not that you asked for the number. I said, what I was trying to emphasize is the amount of people that are engaging with the community that are asking questions. And those and you'd find several per day asking question. [13:45] I see. I see. Got it. So 300 in the group, several actively engaging. How many I mean, isn't the right question with any open source project, how many developers have contributed at least one line of code in the past twelve months? [13:55] >> No. So that's definitely a good indicator, but it's not necessarily the most important one because there's a difference between contributing and using. And it'll [14:03] What's most important for you? [14:05] >> For me, the using part. I see. Because because that the using and asking for features, that really teaches me on what the market needs and how the problem space looks and the details of it. So for example, when Tesla came in and they asked for more features and capabilities to take this to production, there was a shitload of information, pardon my French, that really got us to understand how this would look in greater scales and in [14:32] >> more infrastructure complexity than we necessarily see ourselves with the smaller players. [14:36] So how many Teslas are there today? How many installs? [14:39] >> So it's not it's not installed on a Tesla. It's part of their fleet management solution. [14:44] No. No. No. Or I'm asking as an example. How many companies like Tesla have installed an Instant Pro? [14:50] Are you using the open source? [14:52] >> Yeah. I'd say at least five that I know of. But since it's open source, maybe more. [14:58] Okay. See. [14:59] >> We don't have full visibility on who installs this. Just put the code online and anyone can take it. [15:05] So you're watching, I think this is super smart. You go from agency to open source to five like large companies like Tesla's app, you're installing the thing using it. You're learning from that feedback loop. Are you still pre revenue then today? You haven't you haven't started charging We've [15:19] >> started some early revenue. So we launched our SaaS offering as kind of open to everyone as part of our announcement of coming out of Stealth a month ago. And we now have almost a we're getting close to a dozen customers heading to production. [15:35] Okay. But does that mean does that mean they're paying? [15:37] >> So that means that they're a step before paying. [15:40] I see. Okay. [15:41] >> But it doesn't have basically raised their hand and said, I'm willing to pay for these things, and you're saying, okay. We'll get you launched in sixty days. [15:46] >> Some of them are large corporations, and they already sent us through procurement. [15:52] See. I see. [15:53] >> We questionnaires going through the compliance parts. Yeah. So, it's almost there and I'm actually kind of bewildered that we were able to do that in a bit over a month. [16:04] But but so, yeah, again, generated revenue through some other things, some agency work, some custom work, you're learning through some of some of the, you know, things you're signing with these things. But your your but your pre well, your pre SaaS revenue today, you just launched it a month ago. [16:16] >> Yeah. There's very early revenue from, like, the design partners, but that's [16:21] Of course. Yeah. This is a very smart I think a lot of folks starting out, you, would say, are very experienced with startups. For those of you listening that are new to startups, like this whole idea of going and launching an agency and then signing up design partners who are prepaying for a roadmap and then turning the design partners into your first SaaS customers is like really a smart way to build a SaaS business. So it [16:42] makes sense, the strategy here. [16:43] >> Thank you. I'd like to emphasize that the agency play is not really an agency. Like, we don't charge them for the service or professional services, but it is a way to interact with them, professionally and learn from what what they need and get to product market fit. And then as a follow-up to that, to go to market fit. [17:03] Yep. Now are you still bootstrapping today or have you raised capital? [17:06] >> We've raised a 6,000,000 seed round in July. [17:10] Okay. So last year, did a 6,000,000 seed. Fairly large I would say fairly large seed round even by today's standards for a pre revenue company, but your background probably I mean, it makes sense why you would get that. Did you price that round, or was that on a note? [17:23] >> It was completely a safe. [17:25] A safe. Okay. Uncap safe? [17:28] >> No. It was it's a capped safe, but [17:31] So how do you I guess, my question to you is most most pre seed rounds are right. Like, at a stage you were doing, it's gonna be a million dollar on a safe with a five cap. You obviously didn't do a 5,000,000 cap because you raised 6,000,000. So how do you come up with the right cap? [17:44] >> A very bad idea to do it. Yeah. So how so what was the question? Sorry. [17:49] How do you guys come up with a cap, right, raising 6,000,000 on a note or save? [17:53] >> You start by wetting your finger and waving it in the air and getting a gauge from that. And the rest of it is negotiation like everything else in the market. So you try to get a sense of what you can get for this and then in negotiation you move a bit to the left, a bit to the right. Honestly, I wasn't optimizing for the valuation. I was optimizing for the players I want to work with and [18:18] >> the types of relationships I want to have with the ongoing longer journey of the company. And I even, I think in some parts of it, I decided to opt for a lower valuation to work with people that I wanted. [18:34] Yeah, I know that makes sense. That's why anyone should raise it all the time. Should be to bring strategic partners in. But most folks, you know, dilution is a real thing you have to manage. Most folks are selling, you know, 15 to 20% of business in their pre seed or seed round. Were you sort of in that same range? [18:46] >> 50% of their business if you're doing 15%. [18:49] 15. [18:50] >> Yeah. Yeah. Okay. That's fine. That's fine. [18:52] Yeah. I'm just I'm just I'm just curious. Were you sort of in that same range as everyone else? Right? 15 to 20%? [18:59] >> Yeah. Slightly better, but but [19:01] basically So better would be you raised 6,000,000 and you were able to get away with selling less than sort of 15%, you know, effectively at whatever that cap would be. So the cap would be something like 20,000,000, 25,000,000, something like that. [19:14] >> Yeah. I'd rather not go into the full details, but but yeah. [19:19] Okay. Fair enough. Fair enough. Okay. So where are you using that capital? Why do you need that much capital to build this? [19:24] >> So I'd say two reasons. Two main outlets, let's call it. One is to get the right people and to build something for developers that is such a critical part of infrastructure and affects both the software development cycle and the security posture of an organization. You really need to get this top notch and you need to build top notch things. You need top notch people. So we we don't skimp on the people that we bring and how [19:56] >> we connect them to the organization. So that's one and that's that's basically classic. And the other part is buying enough focus time. So with a product led growth motion, your focus we're actually getting luckier than we expected, But in general, [20:17] >> best practice is to allow yourself the time to grow organically with the market and focus on capitalization and sales only later down the funnel. [20:26] So how many years or months of runway did 6,000,000 buy you based off your projections? [20:30] >> A bit over two years. A bit over two years. [20:33] Got it. And by the my valuation math was wrong a second ago. If you sold less than 15%, it would have been something more like a six on a 40 cap. But point being, you brought in good strategic partners. You bought yourself thinking time for two plus years. [20:43] >> It's more than just thinking time. It's time to kind of adjust and learn the product marketing, but also allow time to allow things to grow. I'll give you an example from another company, a successful company, Snyk, which I I also happen to be, a ambassador for, which is a cute kind of title. Snyk took about, almost a bit over two years to get to a million ARR, which is considered slow if you look if you think [21:12] >> classic enterprise slaves. But two years later, they were already a multibillion dollar company. So the hockey stick there is very steep. [21:22] No. No. I get it. We we have we see stories all the time. I mean, at GetLat, you could fall in his shoes, right? Very similar patterns here. So I'm not discrediting this strategy. I'm just trying to understand what strategy you're pursuing. It makes sense to me. [21:33] >> How many folks first. That's the point. [21:35] >> Yeah. Growth. Yeah. To PLG growth first. Totally understand that. You wanna get that five install base up to 500,000, 5,000,000 and then sort of go from there. [21:43] What's the team size today? How many folks full time? [21:46] >> So we're now 13, actually 14. Okay. I think we'll grow to around 16 immediately, and that's what I'm kind of calling cruising altitude. [21:57] Alright. 16 to cruising altitude. Or we're exciting story here. We're out of time, but let's, in the meantime, wrap up with the famous five. Number one, favorite business book. [22:05] >> I'll give you something that's not exactly a business book, but I use a lot of metaphors from it for business. And it's my favorite book in general, The Selfish Gene by Richard Dawkins. It's a book that basically explains what life is and how it's geared towards to move forward and what evolution is. And I constantly find equivalencies in both business and software development. [22:30] Number two, is there a CEO you're following or studying? [22:35] >> I am a avid admirer of Collison brothers at running Stripe. It's just astounding to see the behemoth that they were able to build. [22:46] Number three, what's your favorite online tool for building permit besides your own? [22:51] >> Online tool to build permit, you say? [22:53] Just something you needed. Yeah. [22:55] >> Yeah. I'd say currently, it's, currently and recently it's GitHub Copilot. I'm astounded not only by how good it is by delivering code, but also documentation. Like I start to write the documentation as part of an MD file and it gives recommendations for the content of the documentation that is slightly better than what I had in mind. So that's powerful on a lot of angles. [23:26] Yep. Okay, great. Number four, how many hours of sleep are you getting every night? [23:31] >> I try to get at least six and sometimes I'd say I'd average at seven. [23:36] And what's your situation? Are married, single, kids? [23:39] >> Married. No kids yet. [23:41] No kids yet. Alright. And how old are you? [23:44] >> I'm I'll be 36 in July. [23:47] Very cool. Happy early well, it's you still got a a little ways. So 35 years old. Last question. [23:51] >> Something you wish you knew when you were 20. [23:53] >> Something I wish I knew when I was 20. [24:00] >> That's a very good question. I think [24:05] >> if you pace yourself, you can learn a lot more things by [24:11] >> gradually than by running yourself forward into the wall, which I've I think I've done too much. [24:17] Guys, 18 and 24, was cutting his teeth in IDF unit eight thousand two hundred. You know what that unit does. He then got into some product led stuff and said, you know what? I hate building the same thing over and over. He's now trying to solve that problem for a lot of people. Right now, Zapier is using it. Tesla's using it. It's called permit.io. Well, permit. Is on top of an open source platform that he's built, [24:36] which is gaining traction. To buy himself time to learn and pivot appropriately, they raised 6,000,000 at cost somewhere around 40,000,000 caps sold less than 15% of the business last year. Now 13 strong, trying to go to 16 to get to cruising altitude to keep building out this open source platform. We will see what happens next. Or thanks for taking us to the top. [24:53] >> Thank you. It was a pleasure. [24:57] One more thing before you go. We have a brand new show every Thursday at 1PM central. It's called Shark Tank for SaaS. We call it deal or bust. One founder comes on, three hungry buyers, they try and do a deal live and the founder shares back end dashboards, their expenses, their revenue, ARPU CAC, LTV, you name it, they share it and the buyers try and make a deal live. It is fun to watch every Thursday 1PM [25:22] Central. Additionally, remember these recorded founder interviews go live. We release them here on YouTube every day at 2PM Central. To make sure you don't miss any of that, make sure you click the subscribe button below here on YouTube, the big red button, and then click the little bell notification to make sure you get notifications when we do go live. I wouldn't want you to miss breaking news in the SaaS world, whether it's an acquisition, a big [25:44] fundraise, a big sale, a big profitability statement or something else. I don't want you to miss it. Additionally, if you want to take this conversation deeper and further, we have by far the largest private Slack community for B2B SaaS founders. You want to get in there. We've probably talked about your tool if you're running a company or your firm if you're investing. You can go in there and quickly search and see what people are saying. Sign [26:06] up for that at nathanlatka.com/slack. In the meantime, I'm hanging out with you here on YouTube. I'll be in the comments for the next thirty minutes. Feel free to let me know what you thought about this episode and if you enjoyed it, click the thumbs up. We get a lot of haters that are mad at how aggressive I am on these shows, but I do it so that we can all learn. We have to counter those people. [26:25] We got to push them away. Click the thumbs up below to counter them and know that I appreciate your guys'support. Alright, I'll be in the comments. See you.

Data and Sources

All figures on this page are taken directly from interviews or are estimates from public sources and proprietary models. Not financial advice. Read full disclaimer.

Claim this profile