Founder Interview
How Dreamdata.io Reached $3M ARR and 120 Paying Customers in 2024 (Interview with CEO Lars Grønnegaard)
- Interview Date
- March 13, 2024
- Interviewee
- Lars GrønnegaardCEO and Co-Founder
Company Metrics at Interview Time
ARR (2024)
$3M
Year-over-Year Growth (2024)
100%
Paying Customers (2024)
120
Team Size (2024)
45
Series A Raised (2023)
$7M
Historical Snapshot
These numbers were reported by Lars Grønnegaard during his interview with Nathan Latka recorded in March 2024 and represent a historical snapshot, not current figures. See Dreamdata.io’s current numbers.
Key Takeaways
- 01Dreamdata.io reached $3M ARR in early 2024, up 100% year over year from $1.5M
- 02The company has 120 paying customers and approximately 600 free users
- 03Average contract value is $25K per year across paying customers
- 04Largest customer pays over $100K per year
- 05The team has grown to 45 full-time employees
- 06Monthly cash burn is $30K and the company is not yet profitable
- 07Founders and staff retain approximately 50% equity after raising $11M total
- 08The startup plan starts at $5K per year; the free tier is $0
- 09Monthly tracked users (MTUs) are the primary upsell driver on the platform
- 10The $7M Series A was raised in late 2022 or early 2023 at a valuation in the $30M range
Company Metrics at Time of Interview
| Metric | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| ARR (2024) | $3M | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| ARR (prior year) (2023) | $1.5M | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Year-over-Year Growth (2024) | 100% | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Paying Customers (2024) | 120 | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Free Users (2024) | 600 | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Average Contract Value (2024) | $25K | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Largest Customer ACV (2024) | $100K+ | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Startup Plan Price (2024) | $5K per year | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Team Size (2024) | 45 | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Monthly Cash Burn (2024) | $30K | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Seed Round (2020) | $4M | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Seed Round Valuation (2020) | $20M | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Series A (2023) | $7M | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Series A Valuation (2023) | $30M | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Founder and Staff Equity (2024) | 50% | Founder interview, March 2024 |
| Year Founded | 2018 | Founder interview, March 2024 |
Growth Breakdown
Revenue
Dreamdata.io reported $3M ARR in early 2024, doubling from approximately $1.5M a year prior. Lars Grønnegaard attributed the 100% year-over-year growth to a mix of new business and expansion, with new business being the primary driver.
Customers
The platform had 120 paying customers and roughly 600 free users at the time of the interview. Average contract value across paying customers was $25K per year, with the largest customer paying over $100K annually.
Team
Dreamdata.io had grown to 45 full-time employees by early 2024. Lars described the company as hiring ahead of revenue, with the goal of having revenue catch up to the org size over the following twelve to eighteen months.
Profitability and Funding
The company was burning approximately $30K per month and was not yet profitable. Dreamdata.io had raised a total of $11M across a $535K pre-seed, a $4M seed round in 2020, and a $7M Series A in 2023, with founders and staff retaining roughly 50% equity.
Growth Strategy
Structured and Transparent Pricing
Lars credited a deliberate, structured approach to pricing as a key growth lever from day one. The company uses a private price calculator so every customer is priced with the same mechanics, enabling predictable modeling when prices change and avoiding one-off discount negotiations.
Usage-Based Upsell via MTUs
Monthly tracked users are the primary upsell driver on the platform. As customers grow their data volume, they naturally move into higher tiers, creating a built-in expansion revenue motion without requiring manual intervention from the sales team.
Free Tier as a Top-of-Funnel Engine
Dreamdata.io maintains a free product that Lars described as bigger and more useful than when it launched. The free tier is designed with deliberate feature limits, such as a two-month data lookback, to create a clear and logical reason for free users to upgrade.
Enterprise Expansion
After building a scalable self-serve product first, the company shifted significant effort toward enterprise readiness in 2024. Lars noted they added enterprise-grade features to move upmarket and capture larger contracts, with the biggest customer already exceeding $100K per year.
Add-On Packaging to Protect Core Price
Features not universally needed, such as content performance analytics, are sold as add-ons rather than bundled into base plans. This approach prevents customers from demanding discounts for unused features and allows the company to extract value from buyers who need specific capabilities.
Best Quotes
“I think fundamentally, like, all those products exist for good reasons. Like, we all wanna serve our customers well. We all want to automate our go to market. We all want to deliver on self-service, enable people to buy without talking too much to sales.”
“Every time you add a new product, you add a new data silo. So every time you add a product, you create a new space for your customer data to live. And our goal to solve that.”
“So we have 120 paid and roughly like 600 free customers.”
“So the grand total is sort of in the mid twenties, but that's like you say like, okay, you got some people paying nothing, and you got some people paying plus a 100. So so there's a there's a big spread.”
“So we're hoping to keep that growth pace of around 100% year on year growth, so that's the target for us.”
“I think we, on the pricing side, we made a conscious decision when we founded the company that we would care a lot about pricing because it is one of the big underutilized levers in a SaaS company.”
“We want to be able to repackage and that means that we, from the get go, have had structured pricing. So you want to avoid the situation where you look at your customer base and basically you've got 120 customers and there are 120 different price plans.”
“2023 was a rough year in SaaS for everybody. We still grew really well. But it was sort of for us, apart from it being maybe we grew well, we would have liked to grow more.”
“I wish I knew. Yeah, it's fun doing a startup. I would have done it earlier.”
What Happened Next
This interview captured Dreamdata.io at a specific moment in early 2024, when the company had just crossed $3M ARR and was actively hiring ahead of revenue to pursue its next growth phase. The figures Lars Grønnegaard shared, including the 120 paying customers, 45-person team, and $30K monthly burn, reflect that point in time and will have changed since. Visit the Dreamdata.io company profile on getLatka for the most current reported metrics.
View Dreamdata.io’s current profile and metricsFull Transcript
Chapters
- 0:00Introduction and Company Snapshot
- 1:42What Makes Dreamdata Different in a Crowded MarTech Market
- 3:10Founding Story, Equity Split, and Seed Round
- 3:52Update Since 2021: Product Evolution and Pricing
- 4:31Startup Plan, Free Tier, and Largest Customer ACV
- 4:54Upsell Mechanics: MTUs, Seats, and Feature Packages
- 7:37Customer Count: 120 Paid and 600 Free Users
- 8:21Add-On Strategy and Pricing Philosophy
- 10:07Average Contract Value and $3M Run Rate
- 10:43Growth Attribution: New Business vs. Expansion
- 12:15Team Size, Cash Burn, and Profitability
- 13:28Series A Details and Remaining Runway
- 14:52Famous Five: Books, Tools, and Personal Life
Introduction and Company Snapshot
Nathan Latka
00:00Dreamdata.io.com launched many years ago, broke $3,000,000 run rate today up from 1,500,000 just a year ago. They also beginning of last year closed a 7,000,000 series a round. Company and employees still own about 50% of the company. They're burning about $30 a month right now, but plenty of runway. They've hired a team of 45. They're hiring ahead of revenue, obviously trying to grow into that revenue figure and their cost structure over the next twelve to eighteen
00:23months, hoping to double a 3,000,000 run rate today, up to 6,000,000 by the end of the year as they compete in the B2B marketing SaaS. And most importantly, we're just organizing your data in the marketing org space with a complete and very clear pricing plan. ARPUs today in the 2,000 per month range, dollars $25 per year across 120 paying customers. Hey folks, if we haven't met yet, my name is Nathan Latka. I launched and sold my
00:46first software company back in 2015 and went on to write a book about it, which you guys made a Wall Street Journal bestseller purchasing over 30,000 copies. Thank you so much for that. After the book, I launched this show and one went on to create founderpath.com. I raised a large fund to do non dilutive deals with b to b software founders. So far, we've invested in over 400 software founders totaling a $150,000,000. Here in 2024, we're
01:16doing three to four new deals per week. So if you're looking for capital and don't wanna give up equity, go sign up at founderpath.com for free to get your offer. Alright. Let's jump into the interview. Hey, folks. My guest today is Lars Gadigal. He is a UX pioneer turned product person turned entrepreneur. He's now building a company called dreamdata.com, which is b two b customer data activation. Lars, you ready to take us to the top?
Lars Grønnegaard
01:39>> Hey, Nathan. Great. Great I'm to be excited for you
What Makes Dreamdata Different in a Crowded MarTech Market
Nathan Latka
01:42to be here. So look, one of the things when I was preparing for this, I look at your website and it says quote, b to b marketing connected to pipeline and revenue. There are so many companies in the space. They say they use AI and machine learning and they're gonna beat ZoomInfo and then you never know who's real and who's legit and they all buy each other's data. How are you different?
Lars Grønnegaard
01:58>> Yeah. I think that's a very good question. So I think fundamentally, there is a lot of, MarTech companies out there and SaaS companies out there in in in the SaaS space for sure. Like, everybody probably knows the 10,000 logo graphic from Scott Brinker. I think fundamentally, like, all those products exist for good reasons. Like, we all wanna serve our customers well. We all want to automate our go to market. We all want to deliver on self-service,
02:25>> enable people to buy without talking too much to sales. And each of these products are purchased to run those efficient processes and to be data driven. But fundamentally, what happens is every time you add a new product, you add a new data silo. So every time you add a product, you create a new space for your customer data to live. And our goal to solve that. So not just create another data silo but actually get all
02:50>> the data out of the different products, build one unified idea about what the customer journey looks like, and then with that you can start seeing things like what's the impact of marketing on revenue or this campaign, how did that impact my revenue or I wanna target my top customers. Now you have all the data in one space.
Founding Story, Equity Split, and Seed Round
Nathan Latka
03:10Now you built a great product at Trustpilot. We use that company. We're very happy with Trustpilot. You were VP of product there. You kick this off this company off in 2018. And I remember you told me in our episode from 2021, you split equity, there's three co founders, you kept 40, Oleg kept 40, and a third co founder had another 20. So that adds up to 80. And then you sold, I think, you raised a $4,000,000
03:33seed round out of 20,000,000 valuation. So you sold another 20% there to investors. Is that all accurate?
Lars Grønnegaard
03:38>> Yeah, more or less. Think we've raised some money since then. And sort of on equity, we are roughly like the founder and and and founder and and staff is is at about 50% now.
Update Since 2021: Product Evolution and Pricing
Nathan Latka
03:52That's great. Well, so so give me an update because when we last spoke in 2021, know, COVID times, etcetera, you were at about 30 you were at 30 customers. You had broken, I think, 500,000 of ARR of revenue. Where how has the product changed since then? And and are you charging more or less than you were back then?
Lars Grønnegaard
04:09>> I think we're charging both more and less. So product is more scalable now, so we have a free product. We had a free product back then as well. Free product is now bigger and more useful for for for our free customers. We have a cheap version of the product, which is reasonably priced, although we we also have, like, startup program.
Startup Plan, Free Tier, and Largest Customer ACV
Nathan Latka
04:31What's that what's that price?
Lars Grønnegaard
04:33>> That so the startup price would start at, like, 5 k. The free is is 0. 5 k 5 k per year? Yeah. And then what's your
Nathan Latka
04:42largest customer paying today total ACV on that customer account?
Lars Grønnegaard
04:46>> Our largest customer is sort of on on the other side of six digits now.
Nathan Latka
04:52Okay. So over 100 k a year?
Lars Grønnegaard
04:53>> Yeah. Yeah. Yeah.
Upsell Mechanics: MTUs, Seats, and Feature Packages
Nathan Latka
04:54And how do you get them to expand from free to 5 k per year to 100 k per year? What's the upsell mechanism? Is it number of contacts Yeah. Or something
Lars Grønnegaard
05:02>> So that's not the same customer. So I think the free customers would tip, like most often would be smaller businesses, whereas a large customer paying north of a 100 k would would be like an enterprise customer.
Nathan Latka
05:13And I understand that. What I'm asking so look, one of the things I think Trustpilot did very well because it worked on me, right, is you guys would carve out like every single thing extra I wanted was always more money. Like if I wanted a certain widget, more money. Premium version of the widget, more money. And before you know what, I'm paying $600 a month for a review tool plugin. So I assume you took some of
05:33this over here. I mean, when I look at your pricing page, you've got like nine bullets under every single one of these things. And then you also give yourself and your AEs the ability to upsell based off numerical values, like number of years, user activity history, seats included and MTUs. Those three, which are the most powerful upsell mechanism for you?
Lars Grønnegaard
05:51>> I would say it's the packages themselves. So it's the feature sets. The feature sets are more or less aligned with different sizes of businesses. So we have add ons and typically we package it so that we have an add on from a larger package and a smaller package in case somebody needs it, but usually like an enterprise customer would fit into the enterprise plan. Mhmm.
Nathan Latka
06:11I guess, let me let me ask this differently. Someone paying you $600 a month on your team plan, which which usage limit are they most likely to hit the quickest? 10 seats or 30,000 MTUs? Oh, the MTUs. Got it. Definitely. Yeah.
Lars Grønnegaard
06:24>> Yeah. So the seat metric makes sense in some very specific use cases, which is why we price on it. But the major driver there is the MTUs, like monthly tracked users, which is basically the data sort of proxy.
Nathan Latka
06:39Did you make decisions on things like putting the avoid ad blockers feature in the business plan versus keeping the B2B web analytics in the free plan? I mean, do you decide on all these things?
Lars Grønnegaard
06:51>> So I think that like in a free plan you need a reasonable unit economics. So you need sort of a you need to be super careful about cost, of course, if you're giving the product away for free. So there's a lot of thinking around like how do we maintain a reasonable cost on that product. So that's a key thing, right? And then of course, we wanna keep each product package needs to have a meaningful feature set
07:15>> that's useful so that people love using it. But especially on a free plan, you want to make sure that there is something to buy, like there are things that you would like to know, like, okay, what happened? I can look two months back in time. B2B sales cycles are often significantly longer than two months, so you want to look further back, right? So there's always, like you say, there's always an upsell.
Customer Count: 120 Paid and 600 Free Users
Nathan Latka
07:37Yep. And so how many, you remember you had 30 back in 2021, how many customers are on the platform today, paid only?
Lars Grønnegaard
07:42>> So yeah, we have 120 paid and roughly like 600 free customers.
Nathan Latka
07:48That's great. So I guess the next question I have for you, because you have one of the more sophisticated pricing pages I've seen, whenever I see a pricing page this sophisticated, I go, okay, they really understand where they're adding value because you also not only decide what utility based metrics to upsell against MTUs, monthly tracked users, you also make decisions around which product features are in each bucket, but you also then have to decide what do
08:09you want to actually keep out of all of the plans and sell them as a separate add on altogether, like content performance or return on investment report. How do you make that decision? Why is content analytics and add on and not included in one of the packages?
Add-On Strategy and Pricing Philosophy
Lars Grønnegaard
08:21>> I think one of the key things that, like, if you wanna have something as an add on, you need to make sure that the base package makes sense. And often we'll see like that the add on feature is something that is not relevant for everybody. I think this is a way of avoiding a situation where you sort of be charging, let's say, 5 ks for the product and people go like, but oh, I don't use this
08:43>> thing. I want a discount. So you avoid that by saying, okay, look, we'll keep that out of the package. We don't have to discuss that. So there's a lot about I think pricing is a lot about, of course, like extracting value from a customer, super important. Creating something that's experienced as fair from both sides. Everybody can understand the pricing. And, yeah. Yeah. So so that's definitely there.
Nathan Latka
09:08And so when you look at the monthly plans, the upsells, the add ons, what's the average customer paying per year these days?
Lars Grønnegaard
09:16>> So the grand total is sort of in the mid twenties, but that's like you say like, okay, you got some people paying nothing, and you got some people paying plus a 100. So so there's a there's a big spread.
Nathan Latka
09:31If we just take mid twenties, $25 a year times 120 customers, it puts you about a 3,000,000 run rate today.
Lars Grønnegaard
09:37>> Yeah, that's roughly there.
Nathan Latka
09:39And where were you exactly a year ago, we can calculate run rate?
Lars Grønnegaard
09:42>> So we did roughly a 100% year on year growth.
Nathan Latka
09:45Okay, well, so what you finished last year, you know, middle last year, you're at like a 1,500,000 run rate, something like that. That's great. And what would you attribute most of that growth to expansion into historical accounts or adding brand new accounts together, altogether?
Lars Grønnegaard
09:58>> It's a mix, definitely, but we are growing a lot of them on the new biz side for sure.
Nathan Latka
10:03That's great. So what's the plan this year? What do hope to grow this year?
Average Contract Value and $3M Run Rate
Lars Grønnegaard
10:07>> So we're hoping to keep that growth pace of around 100% year on year growth, so that's the target for us. We have sort of significant goals around sort of expanding upwards in the market. I think we started with a scalable product, which is like one philosophy. So you start with something that's super scalable and then you go enterprise later. Some people start an enterprise, makes it kind of hard to go super scalable, we feel. So now
10:34>> we are putting a lot of effort into enterprise. You see the feature set, have added a lot of what you would call like enterprise readiness features to be able to serve those customers.
Growth Attribution: New Business vs. Expansion
Nathan Latka
10:43Yeah. Mean, was one of my comments coming into this, right? Is if I didn't know what your revenue was and I only looked to your pricing page, I mean, the complexity on your pricing pace suggests to me and looks a lot more like a 30 or $40,000,000 ARR company. So like you're way How sort of ahead of the curve do you manage your org chart in terms of complexity around all these pricing options relative to sort
11:04of your stage day, 120 customers, 3,000,000?
Lars Grønnegaard
11:08>> I think we, on the pricing side, we made a conscious decision when we founded the company that we would care a lot about pricing because it is one of the big underutilized levers in a SaaS company. One of the things we decided from the get go was, hey, we'll be structured around it and we want to be a company that changes price. We want to be able to repackage and that means that we, from the get
11:32>> go, have had structured pricing. So you want to avoid the situation where you look at your customer base and basically you've got 120 customers and there are 120 different price plans because that creates a lot of low predictability in terms of what happens when I change pricing. So we've always been super structured.
11:55>> I would say our price model is sort of semi public, but underneath it, we have a price calculator. We don't publish it, but everybody is priced with the same mechanics, so we know exactly how people are priced. And that creates transparency. But yeah, I mean, pricing is complex, but, you know, we're we're engineering types, I guess.
Team Size, Cash Burn, and Profitability
Nathan Latka
12:15Yep. Yep. How many folks are full time on the team today?
Lars Grønnegaard
12:18>> Total team is 45 people. 45.
Nathan Latka
12:20And are you guys still burning cash today each month? Are you profitable?
Lars Grønnegaard
12:24>> No, I think like the math there is like not profitable.
Nathan Latka
12:27Okay, what are you comfortable with burning? Are you comfortable burning $30 a month, a $100 a month more?
Lars Grønnegaard
12:33>> Yeah, so 30 is fine at the moment. I think we came out of, so 2023 was a rough year in SaaS for everybody. We still grew really well.
12:46>> But it was sort of for us, apart from it being maybe we grew well, we would have liked to grow more. But it was also a year of sort of scaling the org, and now the next, like this year and first half of next year is sort of about making revenue catch up with the org size. Yep. Double double the next two years and we'll be at roughly yeah.
Nathan Latka
13:06We're about out of time, but just but just to summarize, you're burning right now about $30 a month. You burned maybe more last year, but you're work you're hiring ahead of growth and you hope to get closer profitability end of this year into next.
Lars Grønnegaard
13:17>> Yeah. Yeah.
Nathan Latka
13:18Exactly. How how much of the 4,000,000 seed round from 2020 do you sell in the bank?
Lars Grønnegaard
13:23>> Nothing. Okay. No. No. We raised since then.
Nathan Latka
13:26Oh, you did? How much have you raised since then?
Series A Details and Remaining Runway
Lars Grønnegaard
13:28>> So we raised 7,000,000 series a in, what, early, like, late twenty two, early twenty three.
Nathan Latka
13:35Oh, okay. Great. What can I ask what valuation that was? That that was the heyday. Those were the big rounds.
Lars Grønnegaard
13:39>> Yeah. I think we were no. It wasn't that great. It was kind of a little bit of when things were slowing down a bit. Okay. Yeah. So we were
13:49>> I'm not I'm not I can't see
Nathan Latka
13:52$30.30 30,000,000 ish, 40,000,000?
Lars Grønnegaard
13:54>> Yeah. That range there.
Nathan Latka
13:55Yep. Yep. Okay. So I mean, you sold something like 16% of the company.
Lars Grønnegaard
14:00>> Yeah. So I think in in total, we're at that, like, roughly 50% of of the ship for the founding team and
Nathan Latka
14:07That's great.
14:08>> Working in.
14:08Well, that means you have some of that 7,000,000 left, so you've got plenty of runway.
14:12>> Yeah. Yeah.
14:12Alright. Let's wrap up here, Lars, with The Famous Five. Number one, your favorite book?
Lars Grønnegaard
14:16>> Oh, my favorite book? Yeah. I haven't read it yet, but Marty Cagan came out with a new book, but before that, it would be love to like, I'm a big fan of Marty Cagan, who's like product management guru. That's probably the most influential book for me in in SaaS.
Nathan Latka
14:30Number two, is there a CEO you're following or studying? CEO I'm following
Lars Grønnegaard
14:36>> oh, shit.
Nathan Latka
14:38You can say none.
Lars Grønnegaard
14:39>> None. Yeah, no.
Nathan Latka
14:40Number three, what's your favorite online tool for building the business?
Lars Grønnegaard
14:44>> My favorite online tool for building the business? I think like, okay, I'm gonna be a bit selfish here. I love our own product.
Nathan Latka
14:50Your own. Besides your own.
Famous Five: Books, Tools, and Personal Life
Lars Grønnegaard
14:52>> Besides our own, I'm a big HubSpot fan. Think it's just a marvelous tool. I'll be super happy with that.
Nathan Latka
14:58Number four, how many hours of sleep do get every night?
Lars Grønnegaard
15:00>> What hours of sleep? Sleep? Yeah, six to six to eight.
Nathan Latka
15:05Okay. And situation, married, single kids?
Lars Grønnegaard
15:08>> Married, lots of kids.
15:10Two kids still or
15:10>> you got another one? Three.
Nathan Latka
15:12Three kids now. Congratulations. That's exciting. And how old are you? What? Four? Do you have
Lars Grønnegaard
15:17>> a birthday? 40 years old? 41? Me? 53.
Nathan Latka
15:21Oh, you're 53.
15:24Is that right? You're 53 today? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Take me back to when you were 20. What's something you wish you knew back then?
Lars Grønnegaard
15:32>> When I was 20 what sorry, what was the question?
Nathan Latka
15:35Something you wish you knew.
Lars Grønnegaard
15:37>> I wish I knew. Yeah, it's fun doing a startup. I would have done it earlier.
Nathan Latka
15:43Guys, there you have it. Dreamdata.io.com launched many years ago, broke $3,000,000 run rate today up from 1,500,000 just a year ago. They also beginning of last year closed a 7,000,000 series A round. Company and employees still own about 50% of the company. They're burning about $30 a month right now, but plenty of runway. They've hired a team of 45. They're hiring ahead of revenue, obviously trying to grow into that revenue figure and their cost structure over
16:06the next twelve to eighteen months, hoping to double a 3,000,000 run rate today, up to 6,000,000 by the end of the year as they compete in the B2B marketing SaaS and most importantly, we're just organizing your data in the marketing org space with a complete and very clear pricing plan ARPUs today in the $2,000 per month range $25 per year across 120 paying customers. Lars, thanks for taking us to the
Lars Grønnegaard
16:27>> top. Thanks, Nathan.