Latka logo

Crews & co. vs Consected: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Crews & co. generates $1M in revenue; Consected generates $1M. Crews & co. and Consected are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Crews & co. and Consected on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Crews & co. vs Consected compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCrews & co. logoCrews & co.This companyConsected logoConsected
Revenue$1M$1M
Team sizeNot disclosed1
Founded20132009
HQBraintree, United StatesQuincy, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Crews & co. logo

Crews & co. at a glance

Crews & co. generates $1M in revenue, headquartered in Braintree, United States.

Revenue
$1M
Founded
2013

Management consulting firm providing a proprietary operating system to help businesses increase revenue, profitability and salable asset value

Consected logo

Consected at a glance

Consected generates $1M in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Quincy, United States.

Revenue
$1M
Team size
1
Founded
2009

Since 2009, Consected has been helping companies and non-profits understand how processes and technology can help them work better.

Other Crews & co. alternatives

Crews & co. competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Crews & co. vs Consected: frequently asked questions

Is Crews & co. or Consected bigger?

Crews & co. is the bigger company by revenue, at $1M against $1M for Consected.

How much revenue does Crews & co. make?

Crews & co. generates $1M in annual revenue.

How much revenue does Consected make?

Consected generates $1M in annual revenue with a team of 1.