JM Search vs Elinext: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
JM Search generates $83.7M in revenue; Elinext generates $82.8M. JM Search and Elinext are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares JM Search and Elinext on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  JM SearchThis company |  Elinext |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $83.7M | $82.8M |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $579.7M |
| Team size | 290 | 622 |
| Founded | 1980 | 1997 |
| HQ | King of Prussia, United States | Warsaw, Poland |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
JM Search at a glance
JM Search generates $83.7M in revenue with 290 employees, headquartered in King of Prussia, United States.
- Revenue
- $83.7M
- Team size
- 290
- Founded
- 1980
Executive search firm and advisor to CEOs, investors and boards of directors for recruiting, assessing and delivering transformational leadership teams
Elinext at a glance
Elinext generates $82.8M in revenue with 622 employees, headquartered in Warsaw, Poland.
- Revenue
- $82.8M
- Valuation
- $579.7M
- Team size
- 622
- Founded
- 1997
26+ years experience 700+ developers 300+global clients 1,000+ custom software development projects Strong expertise in software development for Healthcare and Financial companies. We provide comprehensive Product Development Services and…
Other JM Search alternatives
JM Search competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
JM Search vs Elinext: frequently asked questions
Is JM Search or Elinext bigger?
JM Search is the bigger company by revenue, at $83.7M against $82.8M for Elinext.
How much revenue does JM Search make?
JM Search generates $83.7M in annual revenue with a team of 290.
How much revenue does Elinext make?
Elinext generates $82.8M in annual revenue with a team of 622.