AccessOwl vs Zamna: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
AccessOwl generates $2.1M in revenue; Zamna generates $2M. AccessOwl and Zamna are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares AccessOwl and Zamna on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  AccessOwlThis company |  Zamna |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2.1M | $2M |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $29.5M |
| Team size | 14 | 15 |
| Founded | 2022 | 2016 |
| HQ | Berlin, Germany | London, United Kingdom |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
AccessOwl at a glance
AccessOwl generates $2.1M in revenue with 14 employees, headquartered in Berlin, Germany.
- Revenue
- $2.1M
- Team size
- 14
- Founded
- 2022
Managing your Employees' Access to SaaS
Zamna at a glance
Zamna generates $2M in revenue with 15 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.
- Revenue
- $2M
- Valuation
- $29.5M
- Team size
- 15
- Founded
- 2016
Provider of a blockchain-powered data verification platform designed to instantly verify passenger data to reduce the need for manual document checks in airports. The company's platform verifies a passenger's identity prior to arriving at…
Other AccessOwl alternatives
AccessOwl competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
AccessOwl vs Zamna: frequently asked questions
Is AccessOwl or Zamna bigger?
AccessOwl is the bigger company by revenue, at $2.1M against $2M for Zamna.
How much revenue does AccessOwl make?
AccessOwl generates $2.1M in annual revenue with a team of 14.
How much revenue does Zamna make?
Zamna generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 15.