Latka logo

Atlas vs virtualQ: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Atlas generates $2.9M in revenue; virtualQ generates $2.8M. Atlas and virtualQ are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Atlas and virtualQ on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Atlas vs virtualQ compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyAtlas logoAtlasThis companyvirtualQ logovirtualQ
Revenue$2.9M$2.8M
ValuationNot disclosed$28.5M
Team size1929
Founded20212014
HQSan Francisco, United StatesBerlin, Germany

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Atlas logo

Atlas at a glance

Atlas generates $2.9M in revenue with 19 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$2.9M
Team size
19
Founded
2021

Modern customer support platform replacement for Intercom and Zendesk

virtualQ logo

virtualQ at a glance

virtualQ generates $2.8M in revenue with 29 employees, headquartered in Berlin, Germany.

Revenue
$2.8M
Valuation
$28.5M
Team size
29
Founded
2014

Provider of cloud-based call waiting services designed to reduce burden of call waiting. The company's call waiting application easily integrates into any system and lowers telecom costs through the fact that the caller only calls when it…

Other Atlas alternatives

Atlas competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Atlas vs virtualQ: frequently asked questions

Is Atlas or virtualQ bigger?

Atlas is the bigger company by revenue, at $2.9M against $2.8M for virtualQ.

How much revenue does Atlas make?

Atlas generates $2.9M in annual revenue with a team of 19.

How much revenue does virtualQ make?

virtualQ generates $2.8M in annual revenue with a team of 29.