Latka logo

Atomo vs Threads: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Atomo generates $105.4K in revenue; Threads generates $107.8K. Threads and Atomo are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Atomo and Threads on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Atomo vs Threads compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyAtomo logoAtomoThis companyThreads logoThreads
Revenue$105.4K$107.8K
ValuationNot disclosed$754.7K
Team size42
Founded20192012
HQWaterloo, CanadaCedar Falls, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Atomo logo

Atomo at a glance

Atomo generates $105.4K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Waterloo, Canada.

Revenue
$105.4K
Team size
4
Founded
2019

Developer of discovery platform designed for product teams. The company's platform helps teams reduce the amount of time it takes to conduct customer research so they can stay focused on solving problems and not shipping features…

Threads logo

Threads at a glance

Threads generates $107.8K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Cedar Falls, United States.

Revenue
$107.8K
Valuation
$754.7K
Team size
2
Founded
2012

Provider of personal review software. The company provides a software which helps the leaders to hire, review and reward team members based on their contribution to culture.

Other Atomo alternatives

Atomo competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Atomo vs Threads: frequently asked questions

Is Atomo or Threads bigger?

Threads is the bigger company by revenue, at $107.8K against $105.4K for Atomo.

How much revenue does Atomo make?

Atomo generates $105.4K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does Threads make?

Threads generates $107.8K in annual revenue with a team of 2.