Latka logo

Authorea vs STREETRIP: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Authorea generates $241.7K in revenue; STREETRIP generates $241.5K. Authorea and STREETRIP are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Authorea and STREETRIP on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Authorea vs STREETRIP compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyAuthorea logoAuthoreaThis companySTREETRIP logoSTREETRIP
Revenue$241.7K$241.5K
ValuationNot disclosed$2.4M
Team size32
Founded20122016
HQHoboken, United StatesSantiago, Chile

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Authorea logo

Authorea at a glance

Authorea generates $241.7K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Hoboken, United States.

Revenue
$241.7K
Team size
3
Founded
2012

Provider of a collaborative platform designed to read, write, discuss and publish research. The company's platform serves as a powerful document editor for researchers and provides collaborative editing, automatic citation formatting…

STREETRIP logo

STREETRIP at a glance

STREETRIP generates $241.5K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Santiago, Chile.

Revenue
$241.5K
Valuation
$2.4M
Team size
2
Founded
2016

Streetrip is a company that provides business management solutions for mobile businesses.

Other Authorea alternatives

Authorea competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Authorea vs STREETRIP: frequently asked questions

Is Authorea or STREETRIP bigger?

Authorea is the bigger company by revenue, at $241.7K against $241.5K for STREETRIP.

How much revenue does Authorea make?

Authorea generates $241.7K in annual revenue with a team of 3.

How much revenue does STREETRIP make?

STREETRIP generates $241.5K in annual revenue with a team of 2.