Balam vs Easy Insight: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Balam generates $283K in revenue; Easy Insight generates $297.6K. Easy Insight and Balam are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Balam and Easy Insight on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $283K | $297.6K |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $4.5M |
| Team size | 4 | 3 |
| Founded | 2013 | 2008 |
| HQ | Mexico | Denver, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Balam at a glance
Balam generates $283K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Mexico.
- Revenue
- $283K
- Team size
- 4
- Founded
- 2013
Provider of behavior analytics service intended to allow businesses to know, segmentate and communicate with their clients. The company's behavior analytics service helps in identifying key parameters that describe the user's area and…
Easy Insight at a glance
Easy Insight generates $297.6K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Denver, United States.
- Revenue
- $297.6K
- Valuation
- $4.5M
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2008
Provider of an online platform intended to analyze business data. The company's online platform helps to import the user's data, prebuilt reports and dashboards, enabling the users to customize reports and dashboard through a single…
Other Balam alternatives
Balam competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Balam vs Easy Insight: frequently asked questions
Is Balam or Easy Insight bigger?
Easy Insight is the bigger company by revenue, at $297.6K against $283K for Balam.
How much revenue does Balam make?
Balam generates $283K in annual revenue with a team of 4.
How much revenue does Easy Insight make?
Easy Insight generates $297.6K in annual revenue with a team of 3.