BlockVigil vs sheet.best: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
BlockVigil generates $629.3K in revenue; sheet.best generates $630.8K. sheet.best and BlockVigil are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares BlockVigil and sheet.best on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  BlockVigilThis company |  sheet.best |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $629.3K | $630.8K |
| Valuation | $9.4M | $3.8M |
| Team size | 4 | 3 |
| Founded | 2018 | 2019 |
| HQ | San Francisco, United States | Santa Monica, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
BlockVigil at a glance
BlockVigil generates $629.3K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.
- Revenue
- $629.3K
- Valuation
- $9.4M
- Team size
- 4
- Founded
- 2018
Developer of an API gateway for blockchain designed to scale and manage blockchain transactions. The company's API gateway is designed to help, build and scale blockchain applications with just a few lines of code, enabling transactions to…
sheet.best at a glance
sheet.best generates $630.8K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Santa Monica, United States.
- Revenue
- $630.8K
- Valuation
- $3.8M
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2019
Turn your google sheets into a REST API. The product of XO Capital
Other BlockVigil alternatives
BlockVigil competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
BlockVigil vs sheet.best: frequently asked questions
Is BlockVigil or sheet.best bigger?
sheet.best is the bigger company by revenue, at $630.8K against $629.3K for BlockVigil.
How much revenue does BlockVigil make?
BlockVigil generates $629.3K in annual revenue with a team of 4.
How much revenue does sheet.best make?
sheet.best generates $630.8K in annual revenue with a team of 3.