Bond Sports vs CricHQ: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Bond Sports generates $3.3M in revenue; CricHQ generates $9.6M. CricHQ is 2.9× bigger than Bond Sports by revenue. The table below compares Bond Sports and CricHQ on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $3.3M | $9.6M |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $67.5M |
| Team size | 30 | 42 |
| Founded | 2020 | 2010 |
| HQ | United States | Lower Hutt, New Zealand |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Bond Sports at a glance
Bond Sports generates $3.3M in revenue with 30 employees, headquartered in United States.
- Revenue
- $3.3M
- Team size
- 30
- Founded
- 2020
The holistic solution to manage athletic spaces. Save time and money with an easy-to-use, modern platform to manage all of your activities, rentals and members.
CricHQ at a glance
CricHQ generates $9.6M in revenue with 42 employees, headquartered in Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
- Revenue
- $9.6M
- Valuation
- $67.5M
- Team size
- 42
- Founded
- 2010
Developer of a cricket technology platform. The company provides live scoring, competition management and customer relationship management system for cricketers, fans, players, administrators and coaches.
Other Bond Sports alternatives
Bond Sports competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Bond Sports vs CricHQ: frequently asked questions
Is Bond Sports or CricHQ bigger?
CricHQ is the bigger company by revenue, at $9.6M against $3.3M for Bond Sports.
How much revenue does Bond Sports make?
Bond Sports generates $3.3M in annual revenue with a team of 30.
How much revenue does CricHQ make?
CricHQ generates $9.6M in annual revenue with a team of 42.