Latka logo

Bond Sports vs CricHQ: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

Bond Sports generates $3.3M in revenue; CricHQ generates $9.6M. CricHQ is 2.9× bigger than Bond Sports by revenue. The table below compares Bond Sports and CricHQ on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Bond Sports vs CricHQ compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyBond Sports logoBond SportsThis companyCricHQ logoCricHQ
Revenue$3.3M$9.6M
ValuationNot disclosed$67.5M
Team size3042
Founded20202010
HQUnited StatesLower Hutt, New Zealand

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Bond Sports logo

Bond Sports at a glance

Bond Sports generates $3.3M in revenue with 30 employees, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$3.3M
Team size
30
Founded
2020

The holistic solution to manage athletic spaces. Save time and money with an easy-to-use, modern platform to manage all of your activities, rentals and members.

CricHQ logo

CricHQ at a glance

CricHQ generates $9.6M in revenue with 42 employees, headquartered in Lower Hutt, New Zealand.

Revenue
$9.6M
Valuation
$67.5M
Team size
42
Founded
2010

Developer of a cricket technology platform. The company provides live scoring, competition management and customer relationship management system for cricketers, fans, players, administrators and coaches.

Other Bond Sports alternatives

Bond Sports competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Bond Sports vs CricHQ: frequently asked questions

Is Bond Sports or CricHQ bigger?

CricHQ is the bigger company by revenue, at $9.6M against $3.3M for Bond Sports.

How much revenue does Bond Sports make?

Bond Sports generates $3.3M in annual revenue with a team of 30.

How much revenue does CricHQ make?

CricHQ generates $9.6M in annual revenue with a team of 42.