Brand Music vs Soundsuit: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Brand Music generates $660K in revenue; Soundsuit generates $200K. Brand Music is 3.3× bigger than Soundsuit by revenue. The table below compares Brand Music and Soundsuit on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Brand MusicThis company |  Soundsuit |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $660K | $200K |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $2M |
| Team size | 6 | 3 |
| Founded | 1999 | 2013 |
| HQ | Melbourne, Australia | Munich, Germany |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Brand Music at a glance
Brand Music generates $660K in revenue with 6 employees, headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
- Revenue
- $660K
- Team size
- 6
- Founded
- 1999
We create sonic branding and music related campaigns for brands worldwide. From Ford to New Balance, 13CABS and Lincraft, our work is played on Radio and TV near and far. we help you find the sound of your brand and then create something…
Soundsuit at a glance
Soundsuit generates $200K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Munich, Germany.
- Revenue
- $200K
- Valuation
- $2M
- Team size
- 3
- Founded
- 2013
Provider of online music service for businesses. The company provides online music services which is affordable and tailored for venues, cafes and restaurants.
Other Brand Music alternatives
Brand Music competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Brand Music vs Soundsuit: frequently asked questions
Is Brand Music or Soundsuit bigger?
Brand Music is the bigger company by revenue, at $660K against $200K for Soundsuit.
How much revenue does Brand Music make?
Brand Music generates $660K in annual revenue with a team of 6.
How much revenue does Soundsuit make?
Soundsuit generates $200K in annual revenue with a team of 3.