Latka logo

CaliStream vs Elens: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

CaliStream generates $1.1M in revenue; Elens generates $1.1M. Elens and CaliStream are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares CaliStream and Elens on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

CaliStream vs Elens compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCaliStream logoCaliStreamThis companyElens logoElens
Revenue$1.1M$1.1M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$31.1M
Team size1321
Founded20122015
HQSunnyvale, United StatesBeijing, China

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

CaliStream logo

CaliStream at a glance

CaliStream generates $1.1M in revenue with 13 employees, headquartered in Sunnyvale, United States.

Revenue
$1.1M
Team size
13
Founded
2012

Big data simplified! Honu Enterprise: Data collection as a service.

Elens logo

Elens at a glance

Elens generates $1.1M in revenue with 21 employees, headquartered in Beijing, China.

Revenue
$1.1M
Funding
$31.1M
Team size
21
Founded
2015

Developer of analysis technology designed to improve the efficiency of enterprises. The company's technology based on artificial intelligence realizes real-time full-scale mining and efficient and accurate analysis of internet data…

Other CaliStream alternatives

CaliStream competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

CaliStream vs Elens: frequently asked questions

Is CaliStream or Elens bigger?

Elens is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.1M against $1.1M for CaliStream.

How much revenue does CaliStream make?

CaliStream generates $1.1M in annual revenue with a team of 13.

How much revenue does Elens make?

Elens generates $1.1M in annual revenue with a team of 21.

How much funding has Elens raised?

Elens has raised $31.1M in total funding since it was founded in 2015.