Latka logo

CardSpring vs Goodbinder: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

CardSpring generates $101.4K in revenue; Goodbinder generates $95K. CardSpring and Goodbinder are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares CardSpring and Goodbinder on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

CardSpring vs Goodbinder compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCardSpring logoCardSpringThis companyGoodbinder logoGoodbinder
Revenue$101.4K$95K
ValuationNot disclosed$664.9K
Team size31
Founded20102013
HQSan Francisco, United StatesBeachwood, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

CardSpring logo

CardSpring at a glance

CardSpring generates $101.4K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$101.4K
Team size
3
Founded
2010

Provider of Application Programming Interface (API) intended to help developers to add applications to the payment network. The company's Application Programming Interface offers to add new features to credit and debit cards by programming…

Goodbinder logo

Goodbinder at a glance

Goodbinder generates $95K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Beachwood, United States.

Revenue
$95K
Valuation
$664.9K
Team size
1
Founded
2013

Application Development Platform & CMS

Other CardSpring alternatives

CardSpring competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

CardSpring vs Goodbinder: frequently asked questions

Is CardSpring or Goodbinder bigger?

CardSpring is the bigger company by revenue, at $101.4K against $95K for Goodbinder.

How much revenue does CardSpring make?

CardSpring generates $101.4K in annual revenue with a team of 3.

How much revenue does Goodbinder make?

Goodbinder generates $95K in annual revenue with a team of 1.