Latka logo

Cello vs Datek: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Cello generates $3.9M in revenue; Datek generates $4M. Datek and Cello are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Cello and Datek on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Cello vs Datek compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCello logoCelloThis companyDatek logoDatek
Revenue$3.9M$4M
ValuationNot disclosed$27.7M
Team size3592
Founded20041997
HQHolon, IsraelLillestrøm, Norway

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Cello logo

Cello at a glance

Cello generates $3.9M in revenue with 35 employees, headquartered in Holon, Israel.

Revenue
$3.9M
Team size
35
Founded
2004

Cellopark Technologies was founded to make parking easier for everyone. That’s why we’ve always been parking pioneers, developing one of the world’s first parking payment apps and offering cutting-edge IoT-based solutions for both public…

Datek logo

Datek at a glance

Datek generates $4M in revenue with 92 employees, headquartered in Lillestrøm, Norway.

Revenue
$4M
Valuation
$27.7M
Team size
92
Founded
1997

Developer and provider of solutions intended to meet the technological needs of enterprises. The company provides custom machine to machine and IoT solutions in the form of hardware, software and embedded systems, enabling businesses and…

Other Cello alternatives

Cello competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Cello vs Datek: frequently asked questions

Is Cello or Datek bigger?

Datek is the bigger company by revenue, at $4M against $3.9M for Cello.

How much revenue does Cello make?

Cello generates $3.9M in annual revenue with a team of 35.

How much revenue does Datek make?

Datek generates $4M in annual revenue with a team of 92.