Latka logo

Cello vs EcoG: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Cello generates $3.9M in revenue; EcoG generates $4M. EcoG and Cello are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Cello and EcoG on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Cello vs EcoG compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCello logoCelloThis companyEcoG logoEcoG
Revenue$3.9M$4M
ValuationNot disclosed$19.8M
Team size3563
Founded20042017
HQHolon, IsraelMunich, Germany

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Cello logo

Cello at a glance

Cello generates $3.9M in revenue with 35 employees, headquartered in Holon, Israel.

Revenue
$3.9M
Team size
35
Founded
2004

Cellopark Technologies was founded to make parking easier for everyone. That’s why we’ve always been parking pioneers, developing one of the world’s first parking payment apps and offering cutting-edge IoT-based solutions for both public…

EcoG logo

EcoG at a glance

EcoG generates $4M in revenue with 63 employees, headquartered in Munich, Germany.

Revenue
$4M
Valuation
$19.8M
Team size
63
Founded
2017

Provider of an Internet of Things platform intended for electric vehicle charging that can be integrated into local businesses. The company's Internet of Things platform offers a customized electric vehicle fast charging experience through…

Other Cello alternatives

Cello competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Cello vs EcoG: frequently asked questions

Is Cello or EcoG bigger?

EcoG is the bigger company by revenue, at $4M against $3.9M for Cello.

How much revenue does Cello make?

Cello generates $3.9M in annual revenue with a team of 35.

How much revenue does EcoG make?

EcoG generates $4M in annual revenue with a team of 63.