Latka logo

Cercli vs Keela: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Cercli generates $2M in revenue; Keela generates $2M. Keela and Cercli are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Cercli and Keela on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Cercli vs Keela compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCercli logoCercliThis companyKeela logoKeela
Revenue$2M$2M
ValuationNot disclosed$13.8M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$2.9M
CustomersNot disclosed1K
Team size1380
Founded20232013
HQUnited StatesVancouver, Canada

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Cercli logo

Cercli at a glance

Cercli generates $2M in revenue with 13 employees, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$2M
Team size
13
Founded
2023

Rippling for Middle East & North Africa

Keela logo

Keela at a glance

Keela generates $2M in revenue with 80 employees, headquartered in Vancouver, Canada.

Revenue
$2M
Valuation
$13.8M
Funding
$2.9M
Customers
1K
Team size
80
Founded
2013

Operator of impact technology company designed to help the nonprofit organizations. The company's impact technology provides productive technology and centralized dashboard and inbox features allows to get an immediate snapshot of your…

Other Cercli alternatives

Cercli competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Cercli vs Keela: frequently asked questions

Is Cercli or Keela bigger?

Keela is the bigger company by revenue, at $2M against $2M for Cercli.

How much revenue does Cercli make?

Cercli generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 13.

How much revenue does Keela make?

Keela generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 80.

How much funding has Keela raised?

Keela has raised $2.9M in total funding since it was founded in 2013.