Latka logo

ContactLink vs Charge for Outlook: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

ContactLink generates $13K in revenue; Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K. Charge for Outlook is 1.2× bigger than ContactLink by revenue. The table below compares ContactLink and Charge for Outlook on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

ContactLink vs Charge for Outlook compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyContactLink logoContactLinkThis companyCharge for Outlook logoCharge for Outlook
Revenue$13K$15.2K
ValuationNot disclosed$106.3K
Team size12
Founded20202021
HQMemphis, United StatesDover, Unites States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

ContactLink logo

ContactLink at a glance

ContactLink generates $13K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Memphis, United States.

Revenue
$13K
Team size
1
Founded
2020

Chat for Founders & Startups

Charge for Outlook logo

Charge for Outlook at a glance

Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Dover, Unites States.

Revenue
$15.2K
Valuation
$106.3K
Team size
2
Founded
2021

A simple browser extension for bulk outreach with Outlook.

Other ContactLink alternatives

ContactLink competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

ContactLink vs Charge for Outlook: frequently asked questions

Is ContactLink or Charge for Outlook bigger?

Charge for Outlook is the bigger company by revenue, at $15.2K against $13K for ContactLink.

How much revenue does ContactLink make?

ContactLink generates $13K in annual revenue with a team of 1.

How much revenue does Charge for Outlook make?

Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in annual revenue with a team of 2.