ContactLink vs Charge for Outlook: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
ContactLink generates $13K in revenue; Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K. Charge for Outlook is 1.2× bigger than ContactLink by revenue. The table below compares ContactLink and Charge for Outlook on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $13K | $15.2K |
| Valuation | Not disclosed | $106.3K |
| Team size | 1 | 2 |
| Founded | 2020 | 2021 |
| HQ | Memphis, United States | Dover, Unites States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
ContactLink at a glance
ContactLink generates $13K in revenue with 1 employees, headquartered in Memphis, United States.
- Revenue
- $13K
- Team size
- 1
- Founded
- 2020
Chat for Founders & Startups
Charge for Outlook at a glance
Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Dover, Unites States.
- Revenue
- $15.2K
- Valuation
- $106.3K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2021
A simple browser extension for bulk outreach with Outlook.
Other ContactLink alternatives
ContactLink competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
ContactLink vs Charge for Outlook: frequently asked questions
Is ContactLink or Charge for Outlook bigger?
Charge for Outlook is the bigger company by revenue, at $15.2K against $13K for ContactLink.
How much revenue does ContactLink make?
ContactLink generates $13K in annual revenue with a team of 1.
How much revenue does Charge for Outlook make?
Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in annual revenue with a team of 2.