Charge for Outlook vs Scrupp: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in revenue; Scrupp generates $12K. Charge for Outlook is 1.3× bigger than Scrupp by revenue. The table below compares Charge for Outlook and Scrupp on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  Charge for OutlookThis company |  Scrupp |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $15.2K | $12K |
| Valuation | $106.3K | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 2 | Not disclosed |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
| HQ | Dover, Unites States | Not disclosed |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Charge for Outlook at a glance
Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Dover, Unites States.
- Revenue
- $15.2K
- Valuation
- $106.3K
- Team size
- 2
- Founded
- 2021
A simple browser extension for bulk outreach with Outlook.
Scrupp at a glance
Scrupp generates $12K in revenue.
- Revenue
- $12K
- Founded
- 2023
Export high-quality leads from Sales Navigator & Linkedin with accurate contact info, and instantly enrich them with professional emails.
Other Charge for Outlook alternatives
Charge for Outlook competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Charge for Outlook vs Scrupp: frequently asked questions
Is Charge for Outlook or Scrupp bigger?
Charge for Outlook is the bigger company by revenue, at $15.2K against $12K for Scrupp.
How much revenue does Charge for Outlook make?
Charge for Outlook generates $15.2K in annual revenue with a team of 2.
How much revenue does Scrupp make?
Scrupp generates $12K in annual revenue.