Latka logo

Closely vs Zuma: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Closely generates $7.4M in revenue; Zuma generates $7.4M. Zuma and Closely are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Closely and Zuma on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Closely vs Zuma compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyClosely logoCloselyThis companyZuma logoZuma
Revenue$7.4M$7.4M
ValuationNot disclosed$52.1M
Funding raisedNot disclosed$7.2M
Team size4961
FoundedNot disclosed2020
HQUnited StatesSanta Monica, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Closely logo

Closely at a glance

Closely generates $7.4M in revenue with 49 employees, headquartered in United States.

Revenue
$7.4M
Team size
49

Skyrocket your lead generation with Closely's sales engagement platform. Our software, strategies, and hacks empower your team to become LinkedIn outreach experts.

Zuma logo

Zuma at a glance

Zuma generates $7.4M in revenue with 61 employees, headquartered in Santa Monica, United States.

Revenue
$7.4M
Valuation
$52.1M
Funding
$7.2M
Team size
61
Founded
2020

Sales enablement, SAAS

Other Closely alternatives

Closely competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Closely vs Zuma: frequently asked questions

Is Closely or Zuma bigger?

Zuma is the bigger company by revenue, at $7.4M against $7.4M for Closely.

How much revenue does Closely make?

Closely generates $7.4M in annual revenue with a team of 49.

How much revenue does Zuma make?

Zuma generates $7.4M in annual revenue with a team of 61.

How much funding has Zuma raised?

Zuma has raised $7.2M in total funding since it was founded in 2020.