Latka logo

CloudOlive vs Worksup: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

CloudOlive generates $335.3K in revenue; Worksup generates $330K. CloudOlive and Worksup are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares CloudOlive and Worksup on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

CloudOlive vs Worksup compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCloudOlive logoCloudOliveThis companyWorksup logoWorksup
Revenue$335.3K$330K
Valuation$3.4MNot disclosed
Team size53
Founded20202015
HQSydney, AustraliaTallinn, Estonia

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

CloudOlive logo

CloudOlive at a glance

CloudOlive generates $335.3K in revenue with 5 employees, headquartered in Sydney, Australia.

Revenue
$335.3K
Valuation
$3.4M
Team size
5
Founded
2020

CloudOlive is an Automate management of your cloud software and increase margins as your business grows.

Worksup logo

Worksup at a glance

Worksup generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Tallinn, Estonia.

Revenue
$330K
Team size
3
Founded
2015

Worksup is easy to use for the attendees and easy to set up by the organisers. Standard solution covers most of the event needs and can be set up in minutes, while you can tailor the platform by flexibly adding options you need. - Use…

Other CloudOlive alternatives

CloudOlive competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

CloudOlive vs Worksup: frequently asked questions

Is CloudOlive or Worksup bigger?

CloudOlive is the bigger company by revenue, at $335.3K against $330K for Worksup.

How much revenue does CloudOlive make?

CloudOlive generates $335.3K in annual revenue with a team of 5.

How much revenue does Worksup make?

Worksup generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.