Latka logo

/community vs Threads: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

/community generates $106K in revenue; Threads generates $107.8K. Threads and /community are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares /community and Threads on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

/community vs Threads compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
Company/community logo/communityThis companyThreads logoThreads
Revenue$106K$107.8K
ValuationNot disclosed$754.7K
Team size52
Founded20082012
HQSan Francisco, United StatesCedar Falls, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

/community logo

/community at a glance

/community generates $106K in revenue with 5 employees, headquartered in San Francisco, United States.

Revenue
$106K
Team size
5
Founded
2008

/community enables startups to organize conversation, know their community, generate advocacy, and optimize resources.

Threads logo

Threads at a glance

Threads generates $107.8K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Cedar Falls, United States.

Revenue
$107.8K
Valuation
$754.7K
Team size
2
Founded
2012

Provider of personal review software. The company provides a software which helps the leaders to hire, review and reward team members based on their contribution to culture.

Other /community alternatives

/community competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

/community vs Threads: frequently asked questions

Is /community or Threads bigger?

Threads is the bigger company by revenue, at $107.8K against $106K for /community.

How much revenue does /community make?

/community generates $106K in annual revenue with a team of 5.

How much revenue does Threads make?

Threads generates $107.8K in annual revenue with a team of 2.