Latka logo

ConveyThis vs Ongagement: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

ConveyThis generates $321.8K in revenue; Ongagement generates $330K. Ongagement and ConveyThis are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares ConveyThis and Ongagement on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

ConveyThis vs Ongagement compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyConveyThis logoConveyThisThis companyOngagement logoOngagement
Revenue$321.8K$330K
Valuation$4.8MNot disclosed
Customers30KNot disclosed
Team size43
Founded20082011
HQJersey City, United StatesLisboa, Portugal

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

ConveyThis logo

ConveyThis at a glance

ConveyThis generates $321.8K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Jersey City, United States.

Revenue
$321.8K
Valuation
$4.8M
Customers
30K
Team size
4
Founded
2008

Website translation software to globalize your website

Ongagement logo

Ongagement at a glance

Ongagement generates $330K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Lisboa, Portugal.

Revenue
$330K
Team size
3
Founded
2011

ONGAGEMENT provides end-to-end engagement technology with a powerful gamification engine that enables fast implementation and easy management. Gamified Engagement Programs made easy!

Other ConveyThis alternatives

ConveyThis competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

ConveyThis vs Ongagement: frequently asked questions

Is ConveyThis or Ongagement bigger?

Ongagement is the bigger company by revenue, at $330K against $321.8K for ConveyThis.

How much revenue does ConveyThis make?

ConveyThis generates $321.8K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does Ongagement make?

Ongagement generates $330K in annual revenue with a team of 3.