Latka logo

ConX vs Plazma: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

ConX generates $811.1K in revenue; Plazma generates $816.1K. Plazma and ConX are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares ConX and Plazma on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

ConX vs Plazma compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyConX logoConXThis companyPlazma logoPlazma
Revenue$811.1K$816.1K
Valuation$4.1MNot disclosed
Team size1715
Founded20142016
HQSydney, AustraliaNot disclosed

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

ConX logo

ConX at a glance

ConX generates $811.1K in revenue with 17 employees, headquartered in Sydney, Australia.

Revenue
$811.1K
Valuation
$4.1M
Team size
17
Founded
2014

ConX is a SaaS platform built for construction contractors to manage the critical pre-construction process.

Plazma logo

Plazma at a glance

Plazma generates $816.1K in revenue with 15 employees.

Revenue
$816.1K
Team size
15
Founded
2016

SAAS-service, future of media-collaboration

Other ConX alternatives

ConX competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

ConX vs Plazma: frequently asked questions

Is ConX or Plazma bigger?

Plazma is the bigger company by revenue, at $816.1K against $811.1K for ConX.

How much revenue does ConX make?

ConX generates $811.1K in annual revenue with a team of 17.

How much revenue does Plazma make?

Plazma generates $816.1K in annual revenue with a team of 15.