Covidence vs Social Standards: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
Last updated
Covidence generates $2M in revenue; Social Standards generates $2M. Social Standards and Covidence are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Covidence and Social Standards on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company |  CovidenceThis company |  Social Standards |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $2M | $2M |
| Customers | 160K | Not disclosed |
| Team size | 42 | 18 |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| HQ | Melbourne, Australia | Oakland, United States |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
Covidence at a glance
Covidence generates $2M in revenue with 42 employees, headquartered in Melbourne, Australia.
- Revenue
- $2M
- Customers
- 160K
- Team size
- 42
- Founded
- 2014
Covidence is a global SaaS platform for medical researchers.
Social Standards at a glance
Social Standards generates $2M in revenue with 18 employees, headquartered in Oakland, United States.
- Revenue
- $2M
- Team size
- 18
- Founded
- 2015
Rapidly changing markets demand next-generation business and investment strategies rooted in the voice of the consumer. Our BI solutions unlock strategic insights, empowering faster, better decision-making for the CPG executive and…
Other Covidence alternatives
Covidence competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
Covidence vs Social Standards: frequently asked questions
Is Covidence or Social Standards bigger?
Social Standards is the bigger company by revenue, at $2M against $2M for Covidence.
How much revenue does Covidence make?
Covidence generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 42.
How much revenue does Social Standards make?
Social Standards generates $2M in annual revenue with a team of 18.