Latka logo

CricHQ vs Spiideo: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

CricHQ generates $9.6M in revenue; Spiideo generates $15M. Spiideo is 1.6× bigger than CricHQ by revenue. The table below compares CricHQ and Spiideo on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

CricHQ vs Spiideo compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCricHQ logoCricHQThis companySpiideo logoSpiideo
Revenue$9.6M$15M
Valuation$67.5M$135M
Team size42118
Founded20102012
HQLower Hutt, New ZealandMalmö, Sweden

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

CricHQ logo

CricHQ at a glance

CricHQ generates $9.6M in revenue with 42 employees, headquartered in Lower Hutt, New Zealand.

Revenue
$9.6M
Valuation
$67.5M
Team size
42
Founded
2010

Developer of a cricket technology platform. The company provides live scoring, competition management and customer relationship management system for cricketers, fans, players, administrators and coaches.

Spiideo logo

Spiideo at a glance

Spiideo generates $15M in revenue with 118 employees, headquartered in Malmö, Sweden.

Revenue
$15M
Valuation
$135M
Team size
118
Founded
2012

Spiideo makes advanced sports video recording easy, useful and accessible for athletes and coaches.

Other CricHQ alternatives

CricHQ competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

CricHQ vs Spiideo: frequently asked questions

Is CricHQ or Spiideo bigger?

Spiideo is the bigger company by revenue, at $15M against $9.6M for CricHQ.

How much revenue does CricHQ make?

CricHQ generates $9.6M in annual revenue with a team of 42.

How much revenue does Spiideo make?

Spiideo generates $15M in annual revenue with a team of 118.