CricHQ vs Spiideo: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared
CricHQ generates $9.6M in revenue; Spiideo generates $15M. Spiideo is 1.6× bigger than CricHQ by revenue. The table below compares CricHQ and Spiideo on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.
| Company | ||
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | $9.6M | $15M |
| Valuation | $67.5M | $135M |
| Team size | 42 | 118 |
| Founded | 2010 | 2012 |
| HQ | Lower Hutt, New Zealand | Malmö, Sweden |
Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.
CricHQ at a glance
CricHQ generates $9.6M in revenue with 42 employees, headquartered in Lower Hutt, New Zealand.
- Revenue
- $9.6M
- Valuation
- $67.5M
- Team size
- 42
- Founded
- 2010
Developer of a cricket technology platform. The company provides live scoring, competition management and customer relationship management system for cricketers, fans, players, administrators and coaches.
Spiideo at a glance
Spiideo generates $15M in revenue with 118 employees, headquartered in Malmö, Sweden.
- Revenue
- $15M
- Valuation
- $135M
- Team size
- 118
- Founded
- 2012
Spiideo makes advanced sports video recording easy, useful and accessible for athletes and coaches.
Other CricHQ alternatives
CricHQ competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.
CricHQ vs Spiideo: frequently asked questions
Is CricHQ or Spiideo bigger?
Spiideo is the bigger company by revenue, at $15M against $9.6M for CricHQ.
How much revenue does CricHQ make?
CricHQ generates $9.6M in annual revenue with a team of 42.
How much revenue does Spiideo make?
Spiideo generates $15M in annual revenue with a team of 118.