Latka logo

Crystal.work vs Red-Sequence: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Crystal.work generates $277.6K in revenue; Red-Sequence generates $278.3K. Red-Sequence and Crystal.work are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Crystal.work and Red-Sequence on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Crystal.work vs Red-Sequence compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCrystal.work logoCrystal.workThis companyRed-Sequence logoRed-Sequence
Revenue$277.6K$278.3K
ValuationNot disclosed$2.8M
Team size42
Founded20172013
HQParis, FranceTring, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Crystal.work logo

Crystal.work at a glance

Crystal.work generates $277.6K in revenue with 4 employees, headquartered in Paris, France.

Revenue
$277.6K
Team size
4
Founded
2017

Make your Team organization clear at first sight (SaaS)

Red-Sequence logo

Red-Sequence at a glance

Red-Sequence generates $278.3K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Tring, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$278.3K
Valuation
$2.8M
Team size
2
Founded
2013

Building cloud productivity apps for individuals and teams, currently working on Timestamp

Other Crystal.work alternatives

Crystal.work competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Crystal.work vs Red-Sequence: frequently asked questions

Is Crystal.work or Red-Sequence bigger?

Red-Sequence is the bigger company by revenue, at $278.3K against $277.6K for Crystal.work.

How much revenue does Crystal.work make?

Crystal.work generates $277.6K in annual revenue with a team of 4.

How much revenue does Red-Sequence make?

Red-Sequence generates $278.3K in annual revenue with a team of 2.