Latka logo

CubeDrive vs Woompa: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

CubeDrive generates $192.2K in revenue; Woompa generates $188K. CubeDrive and Woompa are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares CubeDrive and Woompa on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

CubeDrive vs Woompa compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCubeDrive logoCubeDriveThis companyWoompa logoWoompa
Revenue$192.2K$188K
Valuation$1.9MNot disclosed
Team size23
Founded20112010
HQOttawa, CanadaPorto Alegre, Brazil

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

CubeDrive logo

CubeDrive at a glance

CubeDrive generates $192.2K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in Ottawa, Canada.

Revenue
$192.2K
Valuation
$1.9M
Team size
2
Founded
2011

CubeDrive is an intelligent BPM software which allows customers to build dynamic forms, apply their business logic with workflow, analyze data and share result with CubeDrive Spreadsheet. CubeDrive let customers to build their application…

Woompa logo

Woompa at a glance

Woompa generates $188K in revenue with 3 employees, headquartered in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

Revenue
$188K
Team size
3
Founded
2010

Woompa is an online platform focused on developing web products for niche markets and web solutions for the construction industry.

Other CubeDrive alternatives

CubeDrive competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

CubeDrive vs Woompa: frequently asked questions

Is CubeDrive or Woompa bigger?

CubeDrive is the bigger company by revenue, at $192.2K against $188K for Woompa.

How much revenue does CubeDrive make?

CubeDrive generates $192.2K in annual revenue with a team of 2.

How much revenue does Woompa make?

Woompa generates $188K in annual revenue with a team of 3.