Latka logo

cubic vs TestObject: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Last updated

cubic generates $220K in revenue; TestObject generates $200.1K. cubic and TestObject are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares cubic and TestObject on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

cubic vs TestObject compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
Companycubic logocubicThis companyTestObject logoTestObject
Revenue$220K$200.1K
Team size25
Founded20252011
HQLondon, United KingdomHennigsdorf, Germany

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

cubic logo

cubic at a glance

cubic generates $220K in revenue with 2 employees, headquartered in London, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$220K
Team size
2
Founded
2025

AI-powered code review platform

TestObject logo

TestObject at a glance

TestObject generates $200.1K in revenue with 5 employees, headquartered in Hennigsdorf, Germany.

Revenue
$200.1K
Team size
5
Founded
2011

Provider of a real device mobile application testing platform. The company provides a cloud-based testing platform for mobile applications, enabling developers to set up automated testing of their applications remotely through a range of…

Other cubic alternatives

cubic competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

cubic vs TestObject: frequently asked questions

Is cubic or TestObject bigger?

cubic is the bigger company by revenue, at $220K against $200.1K for TestObject.

How much revenue does cubic make?

cubic generates $220K in annual revenue with a team of 2.

How much revenue does TestObject make?

TestObject generates $200.1K in annual revenue with a team of 5.