Latka logo

Cupix vs Zuma: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Cupix generates $7.3M in revenue; Zuma generates $7.4M. Zuma and Cupix are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Cupix and Zuma on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Cupix vs Zuma compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCupix logoCupixThis companyZuma logoZuma
Revenue$7.3M$7.4M
Valuation$36.6M$52.1M
Funding raised$20.6M$7.2M
Team size10161
Founded20152020
HQSan Jose, United StatesSanta Monica, United States

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Cupix logo

Cupix at a glance

Cupix generates $7.3M in revenue with 101 employees, headquartered in San Jose, United States.

Revenue
$7.3M
Valuation
$36.6M
Funding
$20.6M
Team size
101
Founded
2015

Cupix provides a cloud based software to automatically map 360 photos and create 3D models only with consumer grade 360 cameras.

Zuma logo

Zuma at a glance

Zuma generates $7.4M in revenue with 61 employees, headquartered in Santa Monica, United States.

Revenue
$7.4M
Valuation
$52.1M
Funding
$7.2M
Team size
61
Founded
2020

Sales enablement, SAAS

Other Cupix alternatives

Cupix competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Cupix vs Zuma: frequently asked questions

Is Cupix or Zuma bigger?

Zuma is the bigger company by revenue, at $7.4M against $7.3M for Cupix.

How much revenue does Cupix make?

Cupix generates $7.3M in annual revenue with a team of 101.

How much revenue does Zuma make?

Zuma generates $7.4M in annual revenue with a team of 61.

How much funding has Cupix raised?

Cupix has raised $20.6M in total funding since it was founded in 2015.

How much funding has Zuma raised?

Zuma has raised $7.2M in total funding since it was founded in 2020.