Latka logo

CYANITE vs ServiceTracker: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

CYANITE generates $1.6M in revenue; ServiceTracker generates $1.6M. ServiceTracker and CYANITE are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares CYANITE and ServiceTracker on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

CYANITE vs ServiceTracker compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyCYANITE logoCYANITEThis companyServiceTracker logoServiceTracker
Revenue$1.6M$1.6M
ValuationNot disclosed$16.4M
Team size288
Founded20182013
HQMannheim, GermanyCaerphilly, United Kingdom

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

CYANITE logo

CYANITE at a glance

CYANITE generates $1.6M in revenue with 28 employees, headquartered in Mannheim, Germany.

Revenue
$1.6M
Team size
28
Founded
2018

AI for the music industry, SaaS

ServiceTracker logo

ServiceTracker at a glance

ServiceTracker generates $1.6M in revenue with 8 employees, headquartered in Caerphilly, United Kingdom.

Revenue
$1.6M
Valuation
$16.4M
Team size
8
Founded
2013

Manage your business inside and out with ServiceTracker "Quote to Cash", business and operational solutions. We specialise in Water Hygiene & Legionella Control, Fire Protection, Security, Access & Electrical, Pest & Environmental Services…

Other CYANITE alternatives

CYANITE competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

CYANITE vs ServiceTracker: frequently asked questions

Is CYANITE or ServiceTracker bigger?

ServiceTracker is the bigger company by revenue, at $1.6M against $1.6M for CYANITE.

How much revenue does CYANITE make?

CYANITE generates $1.6M in annual revenue with a team of 28.

How much revenue does ServiceTracker make?

ServiceTracker generates $1.6M in annual revenue with a team of 8.