Latka logo

Daisee vs DENEVY: Revenue, Funding & Team Size Compared

Daisee generates $3.2M in revenue; DENEVY generates $3.1M. Daisee and DENEVY are close to the same size by revenue. The table below compares Daisee and DENEVY on funding, valuation, customers, team size and headquarters — every figure GetLatka has verified for each company.

Daisee vs DENEVY compared on revenue, funding, valuation, customers and team size
CompanyDaisee logoDaiseeThis companyDENEVY logoDENEVY
Revenue$3.2M$3.1M
Valuation$31.6M$31.3M
Team size3133
Founded20172014
HQSydney, AustraliaPrague, Czech Republic

Want the full dataset? GetLatka tracks revenue, funding and team history for thousands of SaaS companies, with charts, growth rates and founder interviews.

Daisee logo

Daisee at a glance

Daisee generates $3.2M in revenue with 31 employees, headquartered in Sydney, Australia.

Revenue
$3.2M
Valuation
$31.6M
Team size
31
Founded
2017

Developer of a software designed to bridge the gap between technical artificial intelligence and commercial application. The company's software focuses on creating significant value for clients, enabling them to blend software engineering…

DENEVY logo

DENEVY at a glance

DENEVY generates $3.1M in revenue with 33 employees, headquartered in Prague, Czech Republic.

Revenue
$3.1M
Valuation
$31.3M
Team size
33
Founded
2014

Denevy is software engineering company founded with IT specialist and ICT professionals with more than 8 years experiences in Telecommunications and IT industry.

Other Daisee alternatives

Daisee competes with more than the companies on this page. Browse the full alternative lists to compare revenue, funding and team size across the category.

Daisee vs DENEVY: frequently asked questions

Is Daisee or DENEVY bigger?

Daisee is the bigger company by revenue, at $3.2M against $3.1M for DENEVY.

How much revenue does Daisee make?

Daisee generates $3.2M in annual revenue with a team of 31.

How much revenue does DENEVY make?

DENEVY generates $3.1M in annual revenue with a team of 33.